CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Sonnet 5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark

This page compares Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 5 is ahead by 332 points (1,556 vs 1,224; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Sonnet 5 resolves 73.8% versus 36.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Claude 3.5 Haiku streams faster (140 tok/s) while Claude 3.5 Haiku is the cheaper output token ($4/1M). Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Sonnet 5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 5 leads preference Elo (1,556 vs 1,224). Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench coding. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

Elo 1,224$4/1M out

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Elo 1,556$10/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (4)vsClaude Sonnet 5 (6)
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 4W (40%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5: 6W (60%)
← Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude Sonnet 5 →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,224vs1,556
Coding Elo
—vs1,562
SWE-bench
36.2%vs73.8%
LiveBench
44.8%vs70.4%
GPQA Diamond
54.1%vs82.8%
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WClaude Sonnet 5: 5W
Claude 3.5 Haiku (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
140 tok/svs118 tok/s
Time to first token
110 msvs175 ms
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 2WClaude Sonnet 5: 0W
Claude 3.5 Haiku (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$4/1Mvs$10/1M
Input price
$0.8/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
200kvs1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 2WClaude Sonnet 5: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 5

332 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude 3.5 Haiku

22 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Claude 3.5 Haiku

$6.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,224
EloHigh is better
1,556+27%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,562
LiveBench
High is better
44.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
70.4%+57%
SWE-bench
High is better
36.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
73.8%+104%
GPQA
High is better
54.1%
GPQAHigh is better
82.8%+53%
TTFT
Low is better
+59%110 ms
TTFTLow is better
175 ms
Speed
High is better
+19%140 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
118 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+150%$0.8/1M
In $Low is better
$2/1M
Out $
Low is better
+150%$4/1M
Out $Low is better
$10/1M
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
1M+400%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 60% with Claude 3.5 Haiku
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Haiku$88.00 / mo
In: $28.00Out: $60.00
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $150.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Claude 3.5 Haiku is estimated to save $132.00/month ($1,584/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude 3.5 Haiku:Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude 3.5 Haiku:Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatClaude 3.5 Haiku

Lower output list price ($4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 Haiku

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatClaude 3.5 HaikuLower output list price ($4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 HaikuLower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-claude-sonnet-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Elo 1,224
LiveBench44.8%
SWE-bench36.2%
Speed140 tok/s
Output cost$4/1M
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,556). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 36.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude 3.5 Haiku output tokens are $4/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude 3.5 Haiku has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 175 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude Sonnet 5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Haiku matchups →|All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (next haiku)Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5