Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Codestral 25.01 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,320 vs 1,224), while Codestral 25.01 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (51.8%), while Codestral 25.01 is more budget-friendly at $0.9/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.
Mistral code-specialist model.
Δ 96 Arena Elo pts
148 tok/s
$0.9 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Codestral 25.01 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +96 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +9.2% | ||
| SWE-bench | +15.6% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +4.3% | ||
| Time to first token | +40 ms | ||
| Output speed | 140 tok/s | 148 tok/s | +8 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.8/1M | $0.3/1M | +$0.5/1M |
| Output price | $0.9/1M | +$3.1/1M | |
| Context window | +56k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Codestral 25.01 is estimated to save $64.00/month ($768/year).
Higher SWE-bench (51.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (256k).
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Codestral 25.01 | Higher SWE-bench (51.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Codestral 25.01 | Lower output list price ($0.9/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Codestral 25.01 | Larger window (256k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Claude 3.5 Haiku is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-codestral-25/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
