CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.6 Luna benchmark

This page compares Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Luna is ahead by 242 points (1,466 vs 1,224; lmarena (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Luna resolves 61.8% versus 36.2% (swebench (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Luna streams faster (188 tok/s) while GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper output token ($0.6/1M). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.6 Luna is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Luna leads preference Elo (1,466 vs 1,224). GPT-5.6 Luna leads SWE-bench coding. GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

Elo 1,224$4/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

Elo 1,466$0.6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (0)vsGPT-5.6 Luna (10)
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0W (0%)Overall: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: 10W (100%)
← Claude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.6 Luna →
GPT-5.6 Luna (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,224vs1,466
Coding Elo
—vs1,458
SWE-bench
36.2%vs61.8%
LiveBench
44.8%vs64.2%
GPQA Diamond
54.1%vs75.4%
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 5W
GPT-5.6 Luna (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
140 tok/svs188 tok/s
Time to first token
110 msvs88 ms
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 2W
GPT-5.6 Luna (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$4/1Mvs$0.6/1M
Input price
$0.8/1Mvs$0.1/1M
Context window
200kvs1.1M
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Luna 6/6
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Luna

242 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Luna

48 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GPT-5.6 Luna

$3.40/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,224
EloHigh is better
1,466+20%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,458
LiveBench
High is better
44.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.2%+43%
SWE-bench
High is better
36.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
61.8%+71%
GPQA
High is better
54.1%
GPQAHigh is better
75.4%+39%
TTFT
Low is better
110 ms
TTFTLow is better
88 ms+25%
Speed
High is better
140 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
188 tok/s+34%
In $
Low is better
$0.8/1M
In $Low is better
$0.1/1M+700%
Out $
Low is better
$4/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.6/1M+567%
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
1.1M+425%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 86% with GPT-5.6 Luna
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Haiku$88.00 / mo
In: $28.00Out: $60.00
GPT-5.6 Luna$12.50 / mo
In: $3.50Out: $9.00
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Luna is estimated to save $75.50/month ($906/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Luna

Higher SWE-bench (61.8%).

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower TTFT (88 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Luna

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Luna

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Luna).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 LunaHigher SWE-bench (61.8%).
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 LunaLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 LunaLower TTFT (88 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 LunaLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 LunaBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Luna).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

Luna is the OpenAI fast/cheap 5.6 SKU after Jul 30. It is not Sol. Sort by price and TTFT, not Elo.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-gpt-5-6-luna/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Elo 1,224
LiveBench44.8%
SWE-bench36.2%
Speed140 tok/s
Output cost$4/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Elo 1,466
LiveBench64.2%
SWE-bench61.8%
Speed188 tok/s
Output cost$0.6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,466). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna leads SWE-bench at 61.8% vs 36.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Luna output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower time-to-first-token (88 ms vs 110 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1.1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.6 Luna Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Haiku matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Luna matchups →
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (next haiku)GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 mini (previous gpt-mini)Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 LunaClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna