Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Grok 3 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,405 vs 1,224), while Grok 3 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (51.4%), while Claude 3.5 Haiku is more budget-friendly at $4/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.
Δ 181 Arena Elo pts
140 tok/s
$4 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Grok 3 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | Grok 3 (+181) | ||
| LiveBench | Grok 3 (+15.4%) | ||
| SWE-bench | Grok 3 (+15.2%) | ||
| GPQA Diamond | Grok 3 (+20.1%) | ||
| Time to first token | Claude 3.5 Haiku (+140 ms) | ||
| Output speed | 140 tok/s | 88 tok/s | Claude 3.5 Haiku (+52 tok/s) |
| Input price | $0.8/1M | Claude 3.5 Haiku (+$2.2/1M) | |
| Output price | Claude 3.5 Haiku (+$11/1M) | ||
| Context window | Claude 3.5 Haiku (+69k) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Claude 3.5 Haiku is estimated to save $242.00/month ($2,904/year).
Higher SWE-bench (51.4%).
Lower output list price ($4/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (200k).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 3).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Grok 3 | Higher SWE-bench (51.4%). |
| High-volume chat | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Lower output list price ($4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Larger window (200k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Grok 3 | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 3). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-grok-3/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
