CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Seed 2.1 Turbo benchmark

This page compares Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Seed 2.1 Turbo is ahead by 248 points (1,472 vs 1,224; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Seed 2.1 Turbo resolves 63.2% versus 36.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Seed 2.1 Turbo streams faster (160 tok/s) while Seed 2.1 Turbo is the cheaper output token ($2.5/1M). Seed 2.1 Turbo has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Seed 2.1 Turbo is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Seed 2.1 Turbo leads preference Elo (1,472 vs 1,224). Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench coding. Seed 2.1 Turbo is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

Elo 1,224$4/1M out

ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

Elo 1,472$2.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (1)vsSeed 2.1 Turbo (9)
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 1W (10%)Overall: Seed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo: 9W (90%)
← Claude 3.5 HaikuSeed 2.1 Turbo →
Seed 2.1 Turbo (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,224vs1,472
Coding Elo
—vs1,480
SWE-bench
36.2%vs63.2%
LiveBench
44.8%vs64.8%
GPQA Diamond
54.1%vs76.8%
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 5W
Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
140 tok/svs160 tok/s
Time to first token
110 msvs120 ms
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 1WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 1W
Seed 2.1 Turbo (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$4/1Mvs$2.5/1M
Input price
$0.8/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
200kvs262k
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageSeed 2.1 Turbo 6/6
Preference Elo

Seed 2.1 Turbo

248 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Seed 2.1 Turbo

20 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Seed 2.1 Turbo

$1.50/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,224
EloHigh is better
1,472+20%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,480
LiveBench
High is better
44.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.8%+45%
SWE-bench
High is better
36.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.2%+75%
GPQA
High is better
54.1%
GPQAHigh is better
76.8%+42%
TTFT
Low is better
+9%110 ms
TTFTLow is better
120 ms
Speed
High is better
140 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
160 tok/s+14%
In $
Low is better
$0.8/1M
In $Low is better
$0.5/1M+60%
Out $
Low is better
$4/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.5/1M+60%
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
262k+31%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 38% with Seed 2.1 Turbo
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Haiku$88.00 / mo
In: $28.00Out: $60.00
Seed 2.1 Turbo$55.00 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $37.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Seed 2.1 Turbo is estimated to save $33.00/month ($396/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude 3.5 Haiku:Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 Turbo

Higher SWE-bench (63.2%).

High-volume chatSeed 2.1 Turbo

Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 Haiku

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 Turbo

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 Turbo

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 TurboHigher SWE-bench (63.2%).
High-volume chatSeed 2.1 TurboLower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.5 HaikuLower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 TurboLarger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 TurboBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 10, 2026

Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop. Preview-quality story, indexable because we have a full snapshot.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-seed-2-1-turbo/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Elo 1,224
LiveBench44.8%
SWE-bench36.2%
Speed140 tok/s
Output cost$4/1M
ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Elo 1,472
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench63.2%
Speed160 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,472). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench at 63.2% vs 36.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Seed 2.1 Turbo output tokens are $2.5/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Haiku has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 120 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts 262k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Haiku and Seed 2.1 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 10, 2026

    Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Haiku matchups →|All Seed 2.1 Turbo matchups →
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (next haiku)Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (previous seed)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboClaude Opus 4.6 vs Seed 2.1 TurboClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboClaude Opus 5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo