Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Doubao Lite 1.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,360 vs 1,280), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (49%), while Doubao Lite 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.
ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.
Δ 80 Arena Elo pts
180 tok/s
$0.1 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+80) | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+1.9%) | ||
| SWE-bench | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+3%) | ||
| GPQA Diamond | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+0.8%) | ||
| Time to first token | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+170 ms) | ||
| Output speed | 80 tok/s | 180 tok/s | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+100 tok/s) |
| Input price | $0.04/1M | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+$2.96/1M) | |
| Output price | $0.1/1M | Doubao Lite 1.5 (+$14.9/1M) | |
| Context window | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (+167k) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $327.10/month ($3,925/year).
Higher SWE-bench (49%).
Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (200k).
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Higher SWE-bench (49%). |
| High-volume chat | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Lower output list price ($0.1/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Doubao Lite 1.5 | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Larger window (200k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-doubao-1-5-lite/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
