Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,350 vs 1,280), while Gemini 2.5 Pro leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (63.8%), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is more budget-friendly at $10/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.
Δ 70 Arena Elo pts
95 tok/s
$10 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +70 | ||
| LiveBench | +5% | ||
| SWE-bench | +14.8% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +11.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +70 ms | ||
| Output speed | 80 tok/s | 95 tok/s | +15 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.25/1M | +$1.75/1M | |
| Output price | +$5/1M | ||
| Context window | +849k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Gemini 2.5 Pro is estimated to save $136.25/month ($1,635/year).
Higher SWE-bench (63.8%).
Lower output list price ($10/1M).
Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 2.5 Pro).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Higher SWE-bench (63.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Lower output list price ($10/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Lower TTFT (210 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 2.5 Pro). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-5-pro/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
