CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3 benchmark

This page compares Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Fable 5 is ahead by 306 points (1,616 vs 1,310; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Fable 5 resolves 80% versus 48.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). DeepSeek V3 streams faster (66 tok/s) while DeepSeek V3 is the cheaper output token ($1.03/1M). Claude Fable 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Fable 5 leads preference Elo (1,616 vs 1,310). Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek V3 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Elo 1,616$50/1M out

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310$1.0287/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (7)vsDeepSeek V3 (3)
Claude Fable 5: 7W (70%)Overall: Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3: 3W (30%)
← Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3 →
Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,616vs1,310
Coding Elo
1,622vs—
SWE-bench
80%vs48.6%
LiveBench
75.2%vs55.4%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs59.1%
Claude Fable 5: 5WDeepSeek V3: 0W
Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
58 tok/svs66 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs380 ms
Claude Fable 5: 1WDeepSeek V3: 1W
DeepSeek V3 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$50/1Mvs$1.03/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.26/1M
Context window
1Mvs164k
Claude Fable 5: 1WDeepSeek V3: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Fable 5 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Fable 5

306 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

DeepSeek V3

8 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek V3

$48.97/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+23%1,616
EloHigh is better
1,310
Code Elo
High is better
1,622
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
+36%75.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
55.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+65%80%
SWE-benchHigh is better
48.6%
GPQA
High is better
+48%87.6%
GPQAHigh is better
59.1%
TTFT
Low is better
+12%340 ms
TTFTLow is better
380 ms
Speed
High is better
58 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
66 tok/s+14%
In $
Low is better
$10/1M
In $Low is better
$0.26/1M+3785%
Out $
Low is better
$50/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.03/1M+4761%
Context
High is better
+510%1M
ContextHigh is better
164k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 98% with DeepSeek V3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350.00Out: $750.00
DeepSeek V3$24.44 / mo
In: $9.01Out: $15.43
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V3 is estimated to save $1,075.56/month ($12,907/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V3:Pick DeepSeek V3 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V3

Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Fable 5

Lower TTFT (340 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V3Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Fable 5Lower TTFT (340 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is not Sonnet with extra adjectives. It is the expensive long-horizon row. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-deepseek-v3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
LiveBench75.2%
SWE-bench80%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$50/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
LiveBench55.4%
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$1.03/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 48.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V3 output tokens are $1.03/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Fable 5 has the lower time-to-first-token (340 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V3 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All DeepSeek V3 matchups →
DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5