Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro benchmark

Name: Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Fable 5 is ahead by 80 points (1,616 vs 1,536; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Fable 5 resolves 80% versus 71.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). DeepSeek V4 Pro streams faster (70 tok/s) while DeepSeek V4 Pro is the cheaper output token ($0.87/1M). DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Elo 1,616$50/1M out

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

Elo 1,536$0.87/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (6)vsDeepSeek V4 Pro (4)

Claude Fable 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Pro: 4W (40%)

← Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Pro →

Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,616vs1,536

Coding Elo

1,622vs1,544

SWE-bench

80%vs71.6%

LiveBench

75.2%vs70.1%

GPQA Diamond

87.6%vs84%

Claude Fable 5: 5WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 0W

Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

58 tok/svs70 tok/s

Time to first token

340 msvs410 ms

Claude Fable 5: 1WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 1W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$50/1Mvs$0.87/1M

Input price

$10/1Mvs$0.44/1M

Context window

1Mvs1M

Claude Fable 5: 0WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 3W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3

Preference Elo

Claude Fable 5

80 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

DeepSeek V4 Pro

12 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek V4 Pro

$49.13/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

+5%1,616

EloHigh is better

1,536

Code Elo

High is better

+5%1,622

Code EloHigh is better

1,544

LiveBench

High is better

+7%75.2%

LiveBenchHigh is better

70.1%

SWE-bench

High is better

+12%80%

SWE-benchHigh is better

71.6%

GPQA

High is better

+4%87.6%

GPQAHigh is better

84%

TTFT

Low is better

+21%340 ms

TTFTLow is better

410 ms

Speed

High is better

58 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

70 tok/s+21%

In $

Low is better

$10/1M

In $Low is better

$0.44/1M+2199%

Out $

Low is better

$50/1M

Out $Low is better

$0.87/1M+5647%

Context

High is better

ContextHigh is better

1M+5%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 97% with DeepSeek V4 Pro

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo

In: $350.00Out: $750.00

DeepSeek V4 Pro$28.28 / mo

In: $15.22Out: $13.05

Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V4 Pro is estimated to save $1,071.73/month ($12,861/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
DeepSeek V4 Pro:Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Pro

Lower output list price ($0.87/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Fable 5

Lower TTFT (340 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Claude Fable 5	Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chat	DeepSeek V4 Pro	Lower output list price ($0.87/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Claude Fable 5	Lower TTFT (340 ms).
Long-document RAG	DeepSeek V4 Pro	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Claude Fable 5	Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is not Sonnet with extra adjectives. It is the expensive long-horizon row. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

compareJun 13, 2026

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

Top DeepSeek vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually V4 Pro vs Opus 5. License and invoice decide as much as Elo.

launchJun 12, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

2026-06 open-weight-adjacent flagship. The usual cheap-vs-Claude question starts here.

launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-deepseek-v4-pro/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616

LiveBench75.2%

SWE-bench80%

Speed58 tok/s

Output cost$50/1M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Elo 1,536

LiveBench70.1%

SWE-bench71.6%

Speed70 tok/s

Output cost$0.87/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?: Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?: Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 71.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: DeepSeek V4 Pro output tokens are $0.87/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?: Claude Fable 5 has the lower time-to-first-token (340 ms vs 410 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?: DeepSeek V4 Pro is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All DeepSeek V4 Pro matchups →

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (next deepseek)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (6)vsDeepSeek V4 Pro (4)

Claude Fable 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Pro: 4W (40%)

← Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Pro →

Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,616vs1,536

Coding Elo

1,622vs1,544

SWE-bench

80%vs71.6%

LiveBench

75.2%vs70.1%

GPQA Diamond

87.6%vs84%

Claude Fable 5: 5WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 0W

Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

58 tok/svs70 tok/s

Time to first token

340 msvs410 ms

Claude Fable 5: 1WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 1W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$50/1Mvs$0.87/1M

Input price

$10/1Mvs$0.44/1M

Context window

1Mvs1M

Claude Fable 5: 0WDeepSeek V4 Pro: 3W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Pro

Lower output list price ($0.87/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Fable 5

Lower TTFT (340 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Claude Fable 5	Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chat	DeepSeek V4 Pro	Lower output list price ($0.87/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Claude Fable 5	Lower TTFT (340 ms).
Long-document RAG	DeepSeek V4 Pro	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Claude Fable 5	Claude Fable 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 71.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

DeepSeek V4 Pro output tokens are $0.87/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Claude Fable 5 has the lower time-to-first-token (340 ms vs 410 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.

Can I self-host either model?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Claude Fable 5

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Fable 5

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Claude Fable 5

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Fable 5

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons