CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash benchmark

This page compares Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Fable 5 is ahead by 321 points (1,616 vs 1,295; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Fable 5 resolves 80% versus 48% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 2.5 Flash streams faster (185 tok/s) while Gemini 2.5 Flash is the cheaper output token ($2.5/1M). Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Fable 5 leads preference Elo (1,616 vs 1,295). Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Elo 1,616$50/1M out

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Previous Google speed workhorse.

Elo 1,295$2.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (5)vsGemini 2.5 Flash (5)
Claude Fable 5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGemini 2.5 Flash: 5W (50%)
← Claude Fable 5Gemini 2.5 Flash →
Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,616vs1,295
Coding Elo
1,622vs—
SWE-bench
80%vs48%
LiveBench
75.2%vs51.4%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs68.2%
Claude Fable 5: 5WGemini 2.5 Flash: 0W
Gemini 2.5 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
58 tok/svs185 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs110 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WGemini 2.5 Flash: 2W
Gemini 2.5 Flash (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$50/1Mvs$2.5/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Claude Fable 5: 0WGemini 2.5 Flash: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

Claude Fable 5

321 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 2.5 Flash

127 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 2.5 Flash

$47.50/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+25%1,616
EloHigh is better
1,295
Code Elo
High is better
1,622
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
+46%75.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
51.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+67%80%
SWE-benchHigh is better
48%
GPQA
High is better
+28%87.6%
GPQAHigh is better
68.2%
TTFT
Low is better
340 ms
TTFTLow is better
110 ms+209%
Speed
High is better
58 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
185 tok/s+219%
In $
Low is better
$10/1M
In $Low is better
$0.3/1M+3233%
Out $
Low is better
$50/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.5/1M+1900%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M+5%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 96% with Gemini 2.5 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350.00Out: $750.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash$48.00 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $37.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 2.5 Flash is estimated to save $1,052.00/month ($12,624/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 2.5 Flash:Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 2.5 Flash:Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatGemini 2.5 Flash

Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 2.5 Flash

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatGemini 2.5 FlashLower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 2.5 FlashLower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is not Sonnet with extra adjectives. It is the expensive long-horizon row. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

launchMar 25, 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash: previous Google speed workhorse, still a baseline

Useful as a cheap historical compare. 3.7 Flash is the 2026 volume SKU.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gemini-2-5-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
LiveBench75.2%
SWE-bench80%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$50/1M
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Elo 1,295
LiveBench51.4%
SWE-bench48%
Speed185 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 48%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 2.5 Flash output tokens are $2.5/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

  • launch · Mar 25, 2025

    Gemini 2.5 Flash: previous Google speed workhorse, still a baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All Gemini 2.5 Flash matchups →
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (next gemini-flash)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Claude Fable 5