CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Claude Opus 4

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Claude Opus 4 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest is more budget-friendly at $50/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Claude Opus 4 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude Opus 4Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude Opus 4Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude Opus 4Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest (3)Claude Opus 4 (0)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Claude Opus 4
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
~anthropic
Leads 3 of 3
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (~anthropic/claude-fable-latest). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $10 · Out: $50/1M
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

Elo 1,490In: $15 · Out: $75/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest Wins

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

$50 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest (3)vsClaude Opus 4 (7)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 3W (30%)Overall: Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4: 7W (70%)
← Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestClaude Opus 4 →
🏆Claude Opus 4 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsClaude Opus 4
Preference Elo
—vs1,490
Coding Elo
—vs1,502
SWE-bench
—vs72.5%
LiveBench
—vs66.8%
GPQA Diamond
—vs80.4%
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 0WClaude Opus 4: 5W
🏆Claude Opus 4 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsClaude Opus 4
Output speed
—vs58 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs390 ms
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 0WClaude Opus 4: 2W
🏆Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestvsClaude Opus 4
Output price
$50/1Mvs$75/1M+$25/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$15/1M+$5/1M
Context window
1Mvs200k+800k
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: 3WClaude Opus 4: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestClaude Opus 4
Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 41,490
Coding Elo
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 41,502
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 466.8%
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 472.5%
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 480.4%
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 4390 ms
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest—
Claude Opus 458 tok/s
Input priceAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest +$5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$10/1M
Claude Opus 4$15/1M
Output priceAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest +$25/1M
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$50/1M
Claude Opus 4$75/1M
Context windowAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest +800k
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest1M
Claude Opus 4200k
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestClaude Opus 4Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,490
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,502
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
66.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
72.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
80.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$5/1M
Output price
$50/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$25/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+800k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 33% with Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
Claude Opus 4$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $1,125
Estimated Cost Delta

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest is estimated to save $550.00/month ($6,600/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest:Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest:Pick Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Lower output list price ($50/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestLower output list price ($50/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-fable-latest-vs-claude-opus-4/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
~anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Elo 1,490
SWE-bench72.5%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$75/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Claude Opus 4?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Claude Opus 4?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest output tokens are $50/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Claude Opus 4?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Claude Opus 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest matchups →|All Claude Opus 4 matchups →
Claude Opus 4 vs Claude 3 Opus (previous opus)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (next opus)Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4