Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
This page compares Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead by 78 points (1,568 vs 1,490; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.5 resolves 76.8% versus 66.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking streams faster (115 tok/s) while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the cheaper output token ($0.4/1M). Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic frontier coding and computer-use model. SWE-bench leader on the official mini-SWE-agent harness in the Feb 2026 refresh.
Google experimental reasoning model that visualizes thoughts in real-time.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
78 pts advantage
53 tok/s faster
$24.60/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is estimated to save $540.50/month ($6,486/year).
Higher SWE-bench (76.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Lower TTFT (220 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.5).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Opus 4.5 | Higher SWE-bench (76.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking | Lower output list price ($0.4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking | Lower TTFT (220 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 4.5 | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.5). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-gemini-2-flash-thinking/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
