Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)
This page compares Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and MAI-Image-2.5-Flash (Microsoft AI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic frontier coding and computer-use model. SWE-bench leader on the official mini-SWE-agent harness in the Feb 2026 refresh.
Microsoft AI
MAI-Image-2.5-FlashCost-optimized Microsoft AI image model delivering sub-2 second responses at $20/1k images.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
No shared data
No shared data
No shared data
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Need list prices.
Need TTFT on both sides.
Need context sizes.
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | insufficient data | Need list prices. |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | insufficient data | Need context sizes. |
| Screenshots / vision | insufficient data | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-mai-image-2-5-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
