Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
This page compares Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead by 216 points (1,574 vs 1,358; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.6 resolves 75.9% versus 65.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Claude Opus 4.6 streams faster (64 tok/s) while DeepSeek R1 is the cheaper output token ($2.5/1M). Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6Follow-on Opus release. Slightly behind 4.5 on official SWE-bench bash-only in the last published sweep; stronger long-horizon agent traces.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
216 pts advantage
2 tok/s faster
$22.50/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.
DeepSeek R1 is estimated to save $488.00/month ($5,856/year).
Higher SWE-bench (75.9%).
Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Lower TTFT (360 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Claude Opus 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Opus 4.6 | Higher SWE-bench (75.9%). |
| High-volume chat | DeepSeek R1 | Lower output list price ($2.5/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude Opus 4.6 | Lower TTFT (360 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Opus 4.6 | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
Slightly behind 4.5 on one official SWE-bench sweep; stronger long-horizon traces. We keep the row for old vs URLs.
Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-r1/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
