CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash benchmark

This page compares Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead by 84 points (1,574 vs 1,490; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.6 resolves 75.9% versus 71.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). DeepSeek V4 Flash streams faster (142 tok/s) while DeepSeek V4 Flash is the cheaper output token ($0.28/1M). DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Opus 4.6 leads preference Elo (1,574 vs 1,490). Claude Opus 4.6 leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek V4 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Follow-on Opus release. Slightly behind 4.5 on official SWE-bench bash-only in the last published sweep; stronger long-horizon agent traces.

Elo 1,574$25/1M out

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek Jul 31 2026 price-performance SKU. Public listings put it near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Elo 1,490$0.28/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnetvs GPT-5

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Opus 4.6 (5)vsDeepSeek V4 Flash (5)
Claude Opus 4.6: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupDeepSeek V4 Flash: 5W (50%)
← Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V4 Flash →
Claude Opus 4.6 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,574vs1,490
Coding Elo
1,570vs1,516
SWE-bench
75.9%vs71.2%
LiveBench
72%vs67.8%
GPQA Diamond
84.8%vs81.6%
Claude Opus 4.6: 5WDeepSeek V4 Flash: 0W
DeepSeek V4 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
64 tok/svs142 tok/s
Time to first token
360 msvs165 ms
Claude Opus 4.6: 0WDeepSeek V4 Flash: 2W
DeepSeek V4 Flash (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$25/1Mvs$0.28/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Claude Opus 4.6: 0WDeepSeek V4 Flash: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

Claude Opus 4.6

84 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

DeepSeek V4 Flash

78 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$24.72/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+6%1,574
EloHigh is better
1,490
Code Elo
High is better
+4%1,570
Code EloHigh is better
1,516
LiveBench
High is better
+6%72%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.8%
SWE-bench
High is better
+7%75.9%
SWE-benchHigh is better
71.2%
GPQA
High is better
+4%84.8%
GPQAHigh is better
81.6%
TTFT
Low is better
360 ms
TTFTLow is better
165 ms+118%
Speed
High is better
64 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
142 tok/s+122%
In $
Low is better
$5/1M
In $Low is better
$0.14/1M+3471%
Out $
Low is better
$25/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.28/1M+8829%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M+5%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 98% with DeepSeek V4 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4.6$550.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $375.00
DeepSeek V4 Flash$9.10 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $4.20
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V4 Flash is estimated to save $540.90/month ($6,491/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4.6:Pick Claude Opus 4.6 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V4 Flash:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    DeepSeek V4 Flash:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.6

Higher SWE-bench (75.9%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Flash

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek V4 Flash

Lower TTFT (165 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.6Higher SWE-bench (75.9%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 FlashLower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek V4 FlashLower TTFT (165 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 31, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Jul 31): the $0.14/$0.28 price-performance SKU

Public listings put Flash near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M. That is a batch SKU, not a chatbot crown.

launchMay 10, 2026

Claude Opus 4.6: the May follow-on that still shows up in old bookmarks

Slightly behind 4.5 on one official SWE-bench sweep; stronger long-horizon traces. We keep the row for old vs URLs.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-v4-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Elo 1,574
LiveBench72%
SWE-bench75.9%
Speed64 tok/s
Output cost$25/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Elo 1,490
LiveBench67.8%
SWE-bench71.2%
Speed142 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,574). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 75.9% vs 71.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V4 Flash output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (165 ms vs 360 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 31, 2026

    DeepSeek V4 Flash (Jul 31): the $0.14/$0.28 price-performance SKU

  • launch · May 10, 2026

    Claude Opus 4.6: the May follow-on that still shows up in old bookmarks

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4.6 matchups →|All DeepSeek V4 Flash matchups →
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8 (next opus)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (previous deepseek)Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.6Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6