CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Doubao Pro 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Doubao Pro 1.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Doubao Pro 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Doubao Pro 1.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Anthropic
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

$12.5/1M out
ByteDance
Doubao Pro 1.5

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

Elo 1,470$0.28/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

Doubao Pro 1.5

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageDoubao Pro 1.5 5/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) (1)vsDoubao Pro 1.5 (9)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 1W (10%)Overall: Doubao Pro 1.5Doubao Pro 1.5: 9W (90%)
← Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Doubao Pro 1.5 →
Doubao Pro 1.5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,470
Coding Elo
—vs1,465
SWE-bench
—vs62.1%
LiveBench
—vs64%
GPQA Diamond
—vs77.5%
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 0WDoubao Pro 1.5: 5W
Doubao Pro 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs105 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs190 ms
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 0WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W
Doubao Pro 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$12.5/1Mvs$0.28/1M
Input price
$2.5/1Mvs$0.11/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 1WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.51,470
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.51,465
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.564%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.562.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.577.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.5190 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)—
Doubao Pro 1.5105 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input priceDoubao Pro 1.5 (+$2.39/1M)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5$0.11/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output priceDoubao Pro 1.5 (+$12.22/1M)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)$12.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context windowAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) (+872k)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Doubao Pro 1.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,470
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,465
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
64%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
62.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
77.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
190 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
105 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.11/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5 (+$2.39/1M)
Output price
$12.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Doubao Pro 1.5 (+$12.22/1M)
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) (+872k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 97% with Doubao Pro 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)$275.00 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $187.5
Doubao Pro 1.5$8.05 / mo
In: $3.85Out: $4.2
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Pro 1.5 is estimated to save $266.95/month ($3,203/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionDoubao Pro 1.5

Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionDoubao Pro 1.5Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-batch-vs-doubao-1-5-pro-128k/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$12.5/1M
ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

Elo 1,470
LiveBench64%
SWE-bench62.1%
Speed105 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) or Doubao Pro 1.5?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) or Doubao Pro 1.5?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Pro 1.5 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $12.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) or Doubao Pro 1.5?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) and Doubao Pro 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) matchups →|All Doubao Pro 1.5 matchups →
Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5 (previous seed)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Claude Opus 5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Claude Fable 5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5