Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
This page compares Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, DeepSeek V4 Pro is ahead by 46 points (1,536 vs 1,490; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4 resolves 72.5% versus 71.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). DeepSeek V4 Pro streams faster (70 tok/s) while DeepSeek V4 Pro is the cheaper output token ($0.87/1M). DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 ProOpen-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
46 pts advantage
12 tok/s faster
$74.13/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.
DeepSeek V4 Pro is estimated to save $1,621.73/month ($19,461/year).
Higher SWE-bench (72.5%).
Lower output list price ($0.87/1M).
Lower TTFT (390 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Opus 4 | Higher SWE-bench (72.5%). |
| High-volume chat | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Lower output list price ($0.87/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Claude Opus 4 | Lower TTFT (390 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 4 | Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
Top DeepSeek vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually V4 Pro vs Opus 5. License and invoice decide as much as Elo.
2026-06 open-weight-adjacent flagship. The usual cheap-vs-Claude question starts here.
Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-vs-deepseek-v4-pro/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
