CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest vs Kimi K3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest vs Kimi K3 benchmark

This page compares Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest (~anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Kimi K3 wins on output price at $15/1M. Kimi K3 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest vs Kimi K3 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Kimi K3 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

~anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (~anthropic/claude-opus-latest). Preview until a second source matches.

$25/1M out

Moonshot

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI frontier flagship reasoning and agent swarm model with 256k context and top-tier SWE-bench coding capability.

Elo 1,528$15/1M out
Kimi K3 Inference Compute Profile
Inference-Time Compute & Reasoning EffortDynamic CoT

Kimi K3 Reasoning Scaler & Token Billing Simulator

Param: thinking_mode

Reasoning models scale test-time compute by generating hidden chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens. These tokens are billed at standard output rates and directly expand latency (TTFT) in exchange for higher GPQA Diamond and SWE-bench Verified problem resolve rates.

Estimated TTFT
290 ms
1.0x (Standard eval)
CoT Thinking Tokens
~2,500
Billed as output tokens
Est. Cost / 1k Calls
$43.50
7.3x base invoice
STEM / SWE Boost
+5.5%
GPQA & SWE-bench scaling
Medium (Deep Reasoning) Operational Profile

Kimi Swarm reasoning trace for long-context planning.

Direct Provider APIMoonshot
"thinking_mode": "medium"
OpenRouter Unified APIUnified Gateway
"reasoning": {
  "effort": "medium",
  "max_tokens": 2500
}

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest (0)vsKimi K3 (10)
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: 0W (0%)Overall: Kimi K3Kimi K3: 10W (100%)
← Anthropic: Claude Opus LatestKimi K3 →
Kimi K3 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,528
Coding Elo
—vs1,535
SWE-bench
—vs73.8%
LiveBench
—vs69.5%
GPQA Diamond
—vs88.4%
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: 0WKimi K3: 5W
Kimi K3 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs68 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs290 ms
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: 0WKimi K3: 2W
Kimi K3 (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$25/1Mvs$15/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$3/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: 0WKimi K3: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageKimi K3 6/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Token Price Efficiency

Kimi K3

$10.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,528
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,535
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.5%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
73.8%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
88.4%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
290 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
68 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$5.00 / 1M
In $Low is better
$3.00 / 1M+67%
Out $
Low is better
$25.00 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$15.00 / 1M+67%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M+5%
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 40% with Kimi K3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest$550.00 / mo
In: $175Out: $375
Kimi K3$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi K3 is estimated to save $220.00/month ($2,640/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Kimi K3:Pick Kimi K3 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Kimi K3:Pick Kimi K3 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatKimi K3

Lower output list price ($15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGKimi K3

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionKimi K3

Kimi K3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatKimi K3Lower output list price ($15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGKimi K3Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionKimi K3Kimi K3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 8, 2026

Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

Jun 2026. The Kimi vs GPT hub remaps to the top Moonshot Elo vs top OpenAI Elo.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-latest-vs-kimi-k3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
~anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$25/1M
Moonshot

Kimi K3

Elo 1,528
LiveBench69.5%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed68 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest or Kimi K3?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest or Kimi K3?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi K3 output tokens are $15/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest or Kimi K3?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi K3 accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest and Kimi K3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 8, 2026

    Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest matchups →|All Kimi K3 matchups →
Kimi K3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi K3Kimi Chat 1.5 vs Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Kimi K3