CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is ahead by 29 points (1,524 vs 1,495; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3 Flash resolves 75.8% versus 70.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Gemini 3 Flash streams faster (190 tok/s) while Gemini 3 Flash is the cheaper output token ($3/1M). Gemini 3 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads preference Elo (1,524 vs 1,495). Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

Elo 1,524$15/1M out

Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.

Elo 1,495$3/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude 3.7 Sonnetvs GPT-5

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (4)vsGemini 3 Flash (6)
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 4W (40%)Overall: Gemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Flash: 6W (60%)
← Claude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3 Flash →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,524vs1,495
Coding Elo
1,531vs1,510
SWE-bench
70.1%vs75.8%
LiveBench
67.4%vs66.8%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%vs78.4%
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 4WGemini 3 Flash: 1W
Gemini 3 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
88 tok/svs190 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs95 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGemini 3 Flash: 2W
Gemini 3 Flash (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$3/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGemini 3 Flash: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3 Flash 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 4.5

29 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3 Flash

102 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3 Flash

$12.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+2%1,524
EloHigh is better
1,495
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,531
Code EloHigh is better
1,510
LiveBench
High is better
+1%67.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
66.8%
SWE-bench
High is better
70.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%+8%
GPQA
High is better
+2%80.2%
GPQAHigh is better
78.4%
TTFT
Low is better
240 ms
TTFTLow is better
95 ms+153%
Speed
High is better
88 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
190 tok/s+116%
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.5/1M+500%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$3/1M+400%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M+5%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 81% with Gemini 3 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4.5$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Gemini 3 Flash$62.50 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $45.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3 Flash is estimated to save $267.50/month ($3,210/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 3 Flash

Lower output list price ($3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 Flash

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 FlashHigher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 3 FlashLower output list price ($3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 FlashLower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

March 2026 speed SKU. Still a useful cheap-coding compare even after 3.6/3.7 Flash.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-gemini-3-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Elo 1,524
LiveBench67.4%
SWE-bench70.1%
Speed88 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Elo 1,495
LiveBench66.8%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed190 tok/s
Output cost$3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,524). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash?
Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 70.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3 Flash output tokens are $3/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash?
Gemini 3 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 240 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 16, 2026

    Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4.5 matchups →|All Gemini 3 Flash matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (next sonnet)Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (next gemini-flash)Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5