CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5 mini (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is ahead by 114 points (1,524 vs 1,410; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 resolves 70.1% versus 52.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). GPT-5 mini streams faster (155 tok/s) while GPT-5 mini is the cheaper output token ($2/1M). Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads preference Elo (1,524 vs 1,410). Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads SWE-bench coding. GPT-5 mini is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

Elo 1,524$15/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Cost-efficient GPT-5 distill for high-volume agents.

Elo 1,410$2/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude 3.7 Sonnetvs GPT-5

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (6)vsGPT-5 mini (4)
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 mini: 4W (40%)
← Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 mini →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,524vs1,410
Coding Elo
1,531vs1,395
SWE-bench
70.1%vs52.4%
LiveBench
67.4%vs61.2%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%vs72%
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 5WGPT-5 mini: 0W
GPT-5 mini (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
88 tok/svs155 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs140 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGPT-5 mini: 2W
GPT-5 mini (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$2/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.25/1M
Context window
1Mvs400k
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1WGPT-5 mini: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 4.5 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 4.5

114 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5 mini

67 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GPT-5 mini

$13.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+8%1,524
EloHigh is better
1,410
Code Elo
High is better
+10%1,531
Code EloHigh is better
1,395
LiveBench
High is better
+10%67.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
61.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
+34%70.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
52.4%
GPQA
High is better
+11%80.2%
GPQAHigh is better
72%
TTFT
Low is better
240 ms
TTFTLow is better
140 ms+71%
Speed
High is better
88 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
155 tok/s+76%
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.25/1M+1100%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$2/1M+650%
Context
High is better
+150%1M
ContextHigh is better
400k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 88% with GPT-5 mini
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4.5$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
GPT-5 mini$38.75 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $30.00
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5 mini is estimated to save $291.25/month ($3,495/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 4.5

Higher SWE-bench (70.1%).

High-volume chatGPT-5 mini

Lower output list price ($2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 mini

Lower TTFT (140 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 4.5Higher SWE-bench (70.1%).
High-volume chatGPT-5 miniLower output list price ($2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 miniLower TTFT (140 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-gpt-5-mini/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Elo 1,524
LiveBench67.4%
SWE-bench70.1%
Speed88 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Elo 1,410
LiveBench61.2%
SWE-bench52.4%
Speed155 tok/s
Output cost$2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5 mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,524). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5 mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads SWE-bench at 70.1% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5 mini output tokens are $2/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5 mini?
GPT-5 mini has the lower time-to-first-token (140 ms vs 240 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts 1M tokens versus 400k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5 mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4.5 matchups →|All GPT-5 mini matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (next sonnet)GPT-5 mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (previous gpt-mini)GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5.6 Luna (next gpt-mini)GPT-4.5 Orion vs Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 4.5