CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark

This page compares Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) wins on output price at $7.5/1M. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

$7.5/1M out

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Sonnet 5Elo 1,556$10/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) (2)vsClaude Sonnet 5 (7)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 2W (22%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5: 7W (78%)
← Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)1 tiesClaude Sonnet 5 →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,556
Coding Elo
—vs1,562
SWE-bench
—vs73.8%
LiveBench
—vs70.4%
GPQA Diamond
—vs82.8%
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 0WClaude Sonnet 5: 5W
Claude Sonnet 5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs118 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs175 ms
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 0WClaude Sonnet 5: 2W
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$7.5/1Mvs$10/1M
Input price
$1.5/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 2WClaude Sonnet 5: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 4/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Token Price Efficiency

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

$2.50/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,556
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,562
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
70.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
73.8%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
82.8%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
175 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
118 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+33%$1.50 / 1M
In $Low is better
$2.00 / 1M
Out $
Low is better
+33%$7.50 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$10.00 / 1M
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 25% with Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)$165.00 / mo
In: $52.5Out: $112.5
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70Out: $150
Estimated Cost Delta

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is estimated to save $55.00/month ($660/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch):Pick Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Lower output list price ($7.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Lower output list price ($7.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-batch-vs-claude-sonnet-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$7.5/1M
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Claude Sonnet 5?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Claude Sonnet 5?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) output tokens are $7.5/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Claude Sonnet 5?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) matchups →|All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5