CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Luna benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5.6 Luna is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Anthropic
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6). Preview until a second source matches.

$15/1M out
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

Luna Fast / VolumeElo 1,466$0.6/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

GPT-5.6 Luna

$0.6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Luna 6/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0)vsGPT-5.6 Luna (10)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6: 0W (0%)Overall: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: 10W (100%)
← Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Luna →
GPT-5.6 Luna (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,466
Coding Elo
—vs1,458
SWE-bench
—vs61.8%
LiveBench
—vs64.2%
GPQA Diamond
—vs75.4%
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 5W
GPT-5.6 Luna (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs188 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs88 ms
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 2W
GPT-5.6 Luna (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$0.6/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.1/1M
Context window
1Mvs1.1M
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6: 0WGPT-5.6 Luna: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna1,466
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Coding Elo
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna1,458
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
LiveBench
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna64.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
SWE-bench
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna61.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Time to first token
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output speed
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6—
GPT-5.6 Luna188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Input priceGPT-5.6 Luna (+$2.9/1M)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output priceGPT-5.6 Luna (+$14.4/1M)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context windowGPT-5.6 Luna (+50k)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.61M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 LunaAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,466
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,458
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
—
LiveBench—
64.2%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
61.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
75.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Time to first token—
88 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Output speed—
188 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Input price
$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna (+$2.9/1M)
Output price
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna (+$14.4/1M)
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna (+50k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 96% with GPT-5.6 Luna
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
GPT-5.6 Luna$12.50 / mo
In: $3.5Out: $9
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Luna is estimated to save $317.50/month ($3,810/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Luna

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 LunaLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 LunaLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

Luna is the OpenAI fast/cheap 5.6 SKU after Jul 30. It is not Sol. Sort by price and TTFT, not Elo.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-gpt-5-6-luna/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$15/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Elo 1,466
LiveBench64.2%
SWE-bench61.8%
Speed188 tok/s
Output cost$0.6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Luna output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Luna Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Luna matchups →
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 mini (previous gpt-mini)Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 LunaClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 Luna