CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3 Pro

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3 Pro benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3 Pro (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3 Pro is ahead by 97 points (1,552 vs 1,455; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3 Pro resolves 72.4% versus 62.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Claude Sonnet 4 streams faster (92 tok/s) while Gemini 3 Pro is the cheaper output token ($5/1M). Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3 Pro is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3 Pro leads preference Elo (1,552 vs 1,455). Gemini 3 Pro leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3 Pro is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.

Elo 1,455$15/1M out

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Google frontier multimodal model with a multi-million-token context window.

Elo 1,552$5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 4 (0)vsGemini 3 Pro (8)
Claude Sonnet 4: 0W (0%)Overall: Gemini 3 ProGemini 3 Pro: 8W (100%)
← Claude Sonnet 42 tiesGemini 3 Pro →
Gemini 3 Pro (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,455vs1,552
Coding Elo
1,468vs1,548
SWE-bench
62.8%vs72.4%
LiveBench
63.2%vs70.6%
GPQA Diamond
76.4%vs83.6%
Claude Sonnet 4: 0WGemini 3 Pro: 5W
Tied (0/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
92 tok/svs92 tok/s
Time to first token
220 msvs220 ms
Claude Sonnet 4: 0WGemini 3 Pro: 0W
Gemini 3 Pro (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$5/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$1.25/1M
Context window
1Mvs2M
Claude Sonnet 4: 0WGemini 3 Pro: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3 Pro 5/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3 Pro

97 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Sonnet 4

Equal tok/s

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3 Pro

$10.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,455
EloHigh is better
1,552+7%
Code Elo
High is better
1,468
Code EloHigh is better
1,548+5%
LiveBench
High is better
63.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
70.6%+12%
SWE-bench
High is better
62.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
72.4%+15%
GPQA
High is better
76.4%
GPQAHigh is better
83.6%+9%
TTFT
Low is better
220 ms
TTFTLow is better
220 ms
Speed
High is better
92 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
92 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$1.25/1M+140%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$5/1M+200%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
2M+100%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 64% with Gemini 3 Pro
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Gemini 3 Pro$118.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $75.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3 Pro is estimated to save $211.25/month ($2,535/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3 Pro:Pick Gemini 3 Pro when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Sonnet 4:Pick Claude Sonnet 4 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 3 Pro:Pick Gemini 3 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 Pro

Higher SWE-bench (72.4%).

High-volume chatGemini 3 Pro

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4

Lower TTFT (220 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3 Pro

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3 Pro

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Pro).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 ProHigher SWE-bench (72.4%).
High-volume chatGemini 3 ProLower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4Lower TTFT (220 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3 ProLarger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3 ProBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Pro).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 15, 2026

Gemini 3 Pro’s multi-million context is still a 2026 RAG shortlist

March 2026 Google frontier multimodal with a 2M window. 3.6 Pro is newer; 3 Pro stays as the original 3.x Pro row.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-vs-gemini-3-pro/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Elo 1,455
LiveBench63.2%
SWE-bench62.8%
Speed92 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Elo 1,552
LiveBench70.6%
SWE-bench72.4%
Speed92 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,552). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro leads SWE-bench at 72.4% vs 62.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3 Pro output tokens are $5/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4 has the lower time-to-first-token (220 ms vs 220 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 2M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3 Pro Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 15, 2026

    Gemini 3 Pro’s multi-million context is still a 2026 RAG shortlist

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4 matchups →|All Gemini 3 Pro matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (next sonnet)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (previous gemini-pro)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Pro (next gemini-pro)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4