CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen 3 Max

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen 3 Max benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) and Qwen 3 Max (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Qwen 3 Max is ahead by 63 points (1,518 vs 1,455; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Qwen 3 Max resolves 67.8% versus 62.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Claude Sonnet 4 streams faster (92 tok/s) while Qwen 3 Max is the cheaper output token ($3.9/1M). Claude Sonnet 4 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen 3 Max is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Qwen 3 Max leads preference Elo (1,518 vs 1,455). Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench coding. Qwen 3 Max is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.

Elo 1,455$15/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

Elo 1,518$3.9/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 4 (3)vsQwen 3 Max (7)
Claude Sonnet 4: 3W (30%)Overall: Qwen 3 MaxQwen 3 Max: 7W (70%)
← Claude Sonnet 4Qwen 3 Max →
Qwen 3 Max (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,455vs1,518
Coding Elo
1,468vs1,526
SWE-bench
62.8%vs67.8%
LiveBench
63.2%vs69.4%
GPQA Diamond
76.4%vs83.1%
Claude Sonnet 4: 0WQwen 3 Max: 5W
Claude Sonnet 4 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
92 tok/svs80 tok/s
Time to first token
220 msvs280 ms
Claude Sonnet 4: 2WQwen 3 Max: 0W
Qwen 3 Max (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$3.9/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.78/1M
Context window
1Mvs262k
Claude Sonnet 4: 1WQwen 3 Max: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageQwen 3 Max 4/6
Preference Elo

Qwen 3 Max

63 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Sonnet 4

12 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Qwen 3 Max

$11.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,455
EloHigh is better
1,518+4%
Code Elo
High is better
1,468
Code EloHigh is better
1,526+4%
LiveBench
High is better
63.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.4%+10%
SWE-bench
High is better
62.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
67.8%+8%
GPQA
High is better
76.4%
GPQAHigh is better
83.1%+9%
TTFT
Low is better
+27%220 ms
TTFTLow is better
280 ms
Speed
High is better
+15%92 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
80 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.78/1M+285%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$3.9/1M+285%
Context
High is better
+281%1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 74% with Qwen 3 Max
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Qwen 3 Max$85.80 / mo
In: $27.30Out: $58.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 3 Max is estimated to save $244.20/month ($2,930/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen 3 Max:Pick Qwen 3 Max when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Sonnet 4:Pick Claude Sonnet 4 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Claude Sonnet 4:Pick Claude Sonnet 4 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 Max

Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).

High-volume chatQwen 3 Max

Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4

Lower TTFT (220 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionQwen 3 Max

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 MaxHigher SWE-bench (67.8%).
High-volume chatQwen 3 MaxLower output list price ($3.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4Lower TTFT (220 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionQwen 3 MaxBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchApr 18, 2026

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Closed flagship. Strong math. Compare to Sol and Opus on GPQA and SWE-bench, not on brand heat.

launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-vs-qwen-3-max/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Elo 1,455
LiveBench63.2%
SWE-bench62.8%
Speed92 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Elo 1,518
LiveBench69.4%
SWE-bench67.8%
Speed80 tok/s
Output cost$3.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen 3 Max?
Qwen 3 Max has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,518). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen 3 Max?
Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench at 67.8% vs 62.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 3 Max output tokens are $3.9/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen 3 Max?
Claude Sonnet 4 has the lower time-to-first-token (220 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen 3 Max Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Apr 18, 2026

    Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

  • launch · Sep 20, 2025

    Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4 matchups →|All Qwen 3 Max matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (next sonnet)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen QwQ 32B (previous qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B (next qwen)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen 3 MaxClaude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen 3 Max