CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V3 benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 5 is ahead by 246 points (1,556 vs 1,310; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Sonnet 5 resolves 73.8% versus 48.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Claude Sonnet 5 streams faster (118 tok/s) while DeepSeek V3 is the cheaper output token ($1.03/1M). Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V3 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 5 leads preference Elo (1,556 vs 1,310). Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek V3 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Elo 1,556$10/1M out

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310$1.0287/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 5 (8)vsDeepSeek V3 (2)
Claude Sonnet 5: 8W (80%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V3: 2W (20%)
← Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V3 →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,556vs1,310
Coding Elo
1,562vs—
SWE-bench
73.8%vs48.6%
LiveBench
70.4%vs55.4%
GPQA Diamond
82.8%vs59.1%
Claude Sonnet 5: 5WDeepSeek V3: 0W
Claude Sonnet 5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
118 tok/svs66 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs380 ms
Claude Sonnet 5: 2WDeepSeek V3: 0W
DeepSeek V3 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$1.03/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$0.26/1M
Context window
1Mvs164k
Claude Sonnet 5: 1WDeepSeek V3: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 5/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 5

246 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Sonnet 5

52 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek V3

$8.97/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+19%1,556
EloHigh is better
1,310
Code Elo
High is better
1,562
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
+27%70.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
55.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+52%73.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
48.6%
GPQA
High is better
+40%82.8%
GPQAHigh is better
59.1%
TTFT
Low is better
+117%175 ms
TTFTLow is better
380 ms
Speed
High is better
+79%118 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
66 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$2/1M
In $Low is better
$0.26/1M+677%
Out $
Low is better
$10/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.03/1M+872%
Context
High is better
+510%1M
ContextHigh is better
164k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 89% with DeepSeek V3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $150.00
DeepSeek V3$24.44 / mo
In: $9.01Out: $15.43
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V3 is estimated to save $195.56/month ($2,347/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V3:Pick DeepSeek V3 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V3

Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 5

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V3Lower output list price ($1.03/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 5Lower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-5-vs-deepseek-v3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
LiveBench55.4%
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$1.03/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,556). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 48.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V3 output tokens are $1.03/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V3?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V3 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 5 and DeepSeek V3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →|All DeepSeek V3 matchups →
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5