CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is more budget-friendly at $3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Sonnet 5Elo 1,556$10/1M out
Google
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3.1-flash-image). Preview until a second source matches.

$3/1M out

Claude 5 Series Family & Variants (3)

Speed, cost, and intelligence tradeoffs across the Anthropic lineup

vs Base Model
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Base Model
ReasoningFast Route
Elo1624
Speed72 t/s
In /1M$10
Out /1M$50
View specs →vs this
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Fable 5 (X-High Reasoning)
Reasoning
Elo1616
Speed58 t/s
In /1M$10
Out /1M$50
-8 Elo0% price0.8x speed
View specs →vs this
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
Sonnet 5
Elo1556
Speed118 t/s
In /1M$2
Out /1M$10
-68 Elo-80% price1.6x speed
Selected
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Sonnet 5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 5/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Sonnet 5 (8)vsGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (2)
Claude Sonnet 5: 8W (80%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 2W (20%)
← Claude Sonnet 5Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,556vs—
Coding Elo
1,562vs—
SWE-bench
73.8%vs—
LiveBench
70.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
82.8%vs—
Claude Sonnet 5: 5WGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 0W
Claude Sonnet 5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
118 tok/svs—
Time to first token
175 msvs—
Claude Sonnet 5: 2WGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 0W
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$3/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
1Mvs131k
Claude Sonnet 5: 1WGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Claude Sonnet 51,556
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
Coding Elo
Claude Sonnet 51,562
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
LiveBench
Claude Sonnet 570.4%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
SWE-bench
Claude Sonnet 573.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
GPQA Diamond
Claude Sonnet 582.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
Time to first token
Claude Sonnet 5175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
Output speed
Claude Sonnet 5118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)—
Input priceGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (+$1.5/1M)
Claude Sonnet 5$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output priceGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (+$7/1M)
Claude Sonnet 5$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context windowClaude Sonnet 5 (+869k)
Claude Sonnet 51M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,556
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,562
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
70.4%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
SWE-bench
73.8%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
82.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Time to first token
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Input price
$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (+$1.5/1M)
Output price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (+$7/1M)
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5 (+869k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 72% with Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70Out: $150
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$62.50 / mo
In: $17.5Out: $45
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is estimated to save $157.50/month ($1,890/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image):Pick Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Lower output list price ($3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Lower output list price ($3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-5-vs-gemini-3-1-flash-image/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
Google

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 5 or Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) output tokens are $3/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5 or Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 5 and Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →|All Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) matchups →
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)Gemini 3 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5