CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 3.1 70B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 3.1 70B benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and Llama 3.1 70B (Meta) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 5 is ahead by 316 points (1,556 vs 1,240; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Sonnet 5 resolves 73.8% versus 40.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Llama 3.1 70B streams faster (125 tok/s) while Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper output token ($0.4/1M). Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 3.1 70B is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 5 leads preference Elo (1,556 vs 1,240). Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench coding. Llama 3.1 70B is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Elo 1,556$10/1M out

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B

Llama 3.1 70B instruct. Predecessor to 3.3 70B and Llama 4.

Elo 1,240$0.39999999999999997/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 5 (6)vsLlama 3.1 70B (4)
Claude Sonnet 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5Llama 3.1 70B: 4W (40%)
← Claude Sonnet 5Llama 3.1 70B →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,556vs1,240
Coding Elo
1,562vs—
SWE-bench
73.8%vs40.2%
LiveBench
70.4%vs46.8%
GPQA Diamond
82.8%vs48%
Claude Sonnet 5: 5WLlama 3.1 70B: 0W
Llama 3.1 70B (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
118 tok/svs125 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs170 ms
Claude Sonnet 5: 0WLlama 3.1 70B: 2W
Llama 3.1 70B (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$0.4/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$0.4/1M
Context window
1Mvs131k
Claude Sonnet 5: 1WLlama 3.1 70B: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 5

316 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Llama 3.1 70B

7 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Llama 3.1 70B

$9.60/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+25%1,556
EloHigh is better
1,240
Code Elo
High is better
1,562
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
+50%70.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
46.8%
SWE-bench
High is better
+84%73.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
40.2%
GPQA
High is better
+73%82.8%
GPQAHigh is better
48%
TTFT
Low is better
175 ms
TTFTLow is better
170 ms+3%
Speed
High is better
118 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
125 tok/s+6%
In $
Low is better
$2/1M
In $Low is better
$0.4/1M+400%
Out $
Low is better
$10/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.4/1M+2400%
Context
High is better
+663%1M
ContextHigh is better
131k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 91% with Llama 3.1 70B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $150.00
Llama 3.1 70B$20.00 / mo
In: $14.00Out: $6.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 3.1 70B is estimated to save $200.00/month ($2,400/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Llama 3.1 70B:Pick Llama 3.1 70B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Llama 3.1 70B:Pick Llama 3.1 70B when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatLlama 3.1 70B

Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 3.1 70B

Lower TTFT (170 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatLlama 3.1 70BLower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UILlama 3.1 70BLower TTFT (170 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-5-vs-llama-3-1-70b/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
Meta

Llama 3.1 70B

Elo 1,240
LiveBench46.8%
SWE-bench40.2%
Speed125 tok/s
Output cost$0.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 5 or Llama 3.1 70B?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,556). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or Llama 3.1 70B?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 40.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Llama 3.1 70B output tokens are $0.4/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5 or Llama 3.1 70B?
Llama 3.1 70B has the lower time-to-first-token (170 ms vs 175 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 3.1 70B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 5 and Llama 3.1 70B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →|All Llama 3.1 70B matchups →
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.1 405B (previous llama)Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B (next llama)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5