CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 5 vs OpenAI o1-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 vs OpenAI o1-mini benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and OpenAI o1-mini (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 5 is ahead by 111 points (1,556 vs 1,445; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Sonnet 5 resolves 73.8% versus 56.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Claude Sonnet 5 streams faster (118 tok/s) while OpenAI o1-mini is the cheaper output token ($4.4/1M). Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 5 vs OpenAI o1-mini is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 5 leads preference Elo (1,556 vs 1,445). Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench coding. OpenAI o1-mini is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

Elo 1,556$10/1M out

OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

Elo 1,445$4.4/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 5 (8)vsOpenAI o1-mini (2)
Claude Sonnet 5: 8W (80%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 5OpenAI o1-mini: 2W (20%)
← Claude Sonnet 5OpenAI o1-mini →
Claude Sonnet 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,556vs1,445
Coding Elo
1,562vs1,468
SWE-bench
73.8%vs56.4%
LiveBench
70.4%vs62%
GPQA Diamond
82.8%vs76.8%
Claude Sonnet 5: 5WOpenAI o1-mini: 0W
Claude Sonnet 5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
118 tok/svs85 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs280 ms
Claude Sonnet 5: 2WOpenAI o1-mini: 0W
OpenAI o1-mini (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$4.4/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$1.1/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k
Claude Sonnet 5: 1WOpenAI o1-mini: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 5 5/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 5

111 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Sonnet 5

33 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

OpenAI o1-mini

$5.60/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+8%1,556
EloHigh is better
1,445
Code Elo
High is better
+6%1,562
Code EloHigh is better
1,468
LiveBench
High is better
+14%70.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
62%
SWE-bench
High is better
+31%73.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
56.4%
GPQA
High is better
+8%82.8%
GPQAHigh is better
76.8%
TTFT
Low is better
+60%175 ms
TTFTLow is better
280 ms
Speed
High is better
+39%118 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
85 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$2/1M
In $Low is better
$1.1/1M+82%
Out $
Low is better
$10/1M
Out $Low is better
$4.4/1M+127%
Context
High is better
+681%1M
ContextHigh is better
128k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 53% with OpenAI o1-mini
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 5$220.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $150.00
OpenAI o1-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.50Out: $66.00
Estimated Cost Delta

OpenAI o1-mini is estimated to save $115.50/month ($1,386/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    OpenAI o1-mini:Pick OpenAI o1-mini when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude Sonnet 5:Pick Claude Sonnet 5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatOpenAI o1-mini

Lower output list price ($4.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 5

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 5Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatOpenAI o1-miniLower output list price ($4.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 5Lower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

priceAug 10, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

Aug 10 2026 made the $2/$10 list permanent. Sonnet is the default Claude unless the repo is actually on fire.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-5-vs-o1-mini/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Elo 1,556
LiveBench70.4%
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

Elo 1,445
LiveBench62%
SWE-bench56.4%
Speed85 tok/s
Output cost$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 5 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,556). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Claude Sonnet 5 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 56.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
OpenAI o1-mini output tokens are $4.4/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Claude Sonnet 5 has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 5 and OpenAI o1-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 5 matchups →|All OpenAI o1-mini matchups →
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (previous sonnet)OpenAI o1-mini vs GPT-4o mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o1-mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5