CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Codestral 25.01 vs Kimi Chat 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Codestral 25.01 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 benchmark

This page compares Codestral 25.01 (Mistral) and Kimi Chat 1.5 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Kimi Chat 1.5 is ahead by 100 points (1,420 vs 1,320; lmarena (Aug 17, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Codestral 25.01 resolves 51.8% versus 51% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). Codestral 25.01 streams faster (148 tok/s) while Kimi Chat 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.8/1M). Kimi Chat 1.5 has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Codestral 25.01 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Kimi Chat 1.5 leads preference Elo (1,420 vs 1,320). Codestral 25.01 leads SWE-bench coding. Kimi Chat 1.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Mistral

Codestral 25.01

Mistral code-specialist model.

Elo 1,320$0.9/1M out

Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

Elo 1,420$0.8/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Codestral 25.01 (4)vsKimi Chat 1.5 (6)
Codestral 25.01: 4W (40%)Overall: Kimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5: 6W (60%)
← Codestral 25.01Kimi Chat 1.5 →
Kimi Chat 1.5 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,320vs1,420
Coding Elo
1,402vs1,390
SWE-bench
51.8%vs51%
LiveBench
54%vs58%
GPQA Diamond
58.4%vs71.5%
Codestral 25.01: 2WKimi Chat 1.5: 3W
Codestral 25.01 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
148 tok/svs95 tok/s
Time to first token
150 msvs210 ms
Codestral 25.01: 2WKimi Chat 1.5: 0W
Kimi Chat 1.5 (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.9/1Mvs$0.8/1M
Input price
$0.3/1Mvs$0.2/1M
Context window
256kvs2M
Codestral 25.01: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageKimi Chat 1.5 4/6
Preference Elo

Kimi Chat 1.5

100 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Codestral 25.01

53 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Kimi Chat 1.5

$0.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,320
EloHigh is better
1,420+8%
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,402
Code EloHigh is better
1,390
LiveBench
High is better
54%
LiveBenchHigh is better
58%+7%
SWE-bench
High is better
+2%51.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
51%
GPQA
High is better
58.4%
GPQAHigh is better
71.5%+22%
TTFT
Low is better
+40%150 ms
TTFTLow is better
210 ms
Speed
High is better
+56%148 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
95 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.2/1M+50%
Out $
Low is better
$0.9/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.8/1M+12%
Context
High is better
256k
ContextHigh is better
2M+681%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 21% with Kimi Chat 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Codestral 25.01$24.00 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $13.50
Kimi Chat 1.5$19.00 / mo
In: $7.00Out: $12.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi Chat 1.5 is estimated to save $5.00/month ($60/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Codestral 25.01:Pick Codestral 25.01 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Codestral 25.01:Pick Codestral 25.01 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsCodestral 25.01

Higher SWE-bench (51.8%).

High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICodestral 25.01

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5

Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsCodestral 25.01Higher SWE-bench (51.8%).
High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICodestral 25.01Lower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5Larger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJan 14, 2025

Codestral 25.01: Mistral’s code-specialist row

Jan 2025 code model. Still a valid cheap-coding compare. Not a chatbot.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/codestral-25-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Mistral

Codestral 25.01

Elo 1,320
LiveBench54%
SWE-bench51.8%
Speed148 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M
Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Elo 1,420
LiveBench58%
SWE-bench51%
Speed95 tok/s
Output cost$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Codestral 25.01 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Kimi Chat 1.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,420). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Codestral 25.01 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Codestral 25.01 leads SWE-bench at 51.8% vs 51%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi Chat 1.5 output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $0.9/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Codestral 25.01 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Codestral 25.01 has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 210 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi Chat 1.5 accepts 2M tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Codestral 25.01 and Kimi Chat 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jan 14, 2025

    Codestral 25.01: Mistral’s code-specialist row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Codestral 25.01 matchups →|All Kimi Chat 1.5 matchups →
Codestral 25.01 vs Mistral Large 3 (next mistral)Kimi Chat 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (next kimi)Mistral Large 3 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Kimi K3 vs Kimi Chat 1.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5