CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B vs Command A
Independent ReportPairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
noindex (thin pair)
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B(deepcogito)
vs
Command A(Cohere)

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B vs Command A benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B is more budget-friendly at $1.25/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B and Command A present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Command ATop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Command ATop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Command AFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B (2)Command A (1)
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Command A
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
deepcogito
Leads 2 of 3
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (deepcogito/cogito-v2.1-671b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1.25 · Out: $1.25/1M
Cohere
Leads 1 of 3
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344In: $2.5 · Out: $10/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B Wins

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B

$1.25 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B (2)vsCommand A (7)
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B: 2W (22%)Overall: Command ACommand A: 7W (78%)
← Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BCommand A →
🏆Command A Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BvsCommand A
Preference Elo
—vs1,344
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs42.6%
LiveBench
—vs56.2%
GPQA Diamond
—vs66%
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B: 0WCommand A: 4W
🏆Command A Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BvsCommand A
Output speed
—vs118 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs175 ms
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B: 0WCommand A: 2W
🏆Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BvsCommand A
Output price
$1.25/1Mvs$10/1M+$8.75/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$2.5/1M+$1.25/1M
Context window
128kvs256k+128k
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B: 2WCommand A: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BCommand A
Preference Elo
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A1,344
LiveBench
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A56.2%
SWE-bench
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A42.6%
GPQA Diamond
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A66%
Time to first token
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A175 ms
Output speed
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B—
Command A118 tok/s
Input priceDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B +$1.25/1M
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B$1.25/1M
Command A$2.5/1M
Output priceDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B +$8.75/1M
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B$1.25/1M
Command A$10/1M
Context windowCommand A +128k
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B128k
Command A256k
BenchmarkDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BCommand AAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,344
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
56.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
42.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$1.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$1.25/1M
Output price
$1.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$8.75/1M
Context window
128k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+128k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 74% with Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B$62.50 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $18.75
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
Estimated Cost Delta

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B is estimated to save $175.00/month ($2,100/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B:Pick Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B

Lower output list price ($1.25/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionCommand A

Command A is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDeep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671BLower output list price ($1.25/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGCommand ALarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionCommand ACommand A is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/cogito-v2-1-671b-vs-command-a/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
deepcogito

Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)128k
Input / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B or Command A?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B or Command A?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B output tokens are $1.25/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B or Command A?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B and Command A Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B matchups →|All Command A matchups →
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Command AClaude Opus 4.6 vs Command AClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command AGPT-5 vs Command AGemini 3 Pro vs Command AGemini 3 Flash vs Command A