Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Command A vs Grok 4 benchmark

Name: Command A vs Grok 4 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Command A (Cohere) and Grok 4 (xAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 4 is ahead by 144 points (1,488 vs 1,344; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Grok 4 resolves 58.6% versus 42.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Command A streams faster (118 tok/s) while Command A is the cheaper output token ($10/1M). Command A has the larger context window (256k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Cohere

Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out

xAI

Grok 4

Previous xAI flagship.

Elo 1,488$15/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Command A (4)vsGrok 4 (4)

Command A: 4W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGrok 4: 4W (50%)

← Command A1 tiesGrok 4 →

Grok 4 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,344vs1,488

Coding Elo

—vs—

SWE-bench

42.6%vs58.6%

LiveBench

56.2%vs64.1%

GPQA Diamond

66%vs79%

Command A: 0WGrok 4: 4W

Command A (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs98 tok/s

Time to first token

175 msvs230 ms

Command A: 2WGrok 4: 0W

Command A (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$15/1M

Input price

$2.5/1Mvs$3/1M

Context window

256kvs256k

Command A: 2WGrok 4: 0W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGrok 4 3/6

Preference Elo

Grok 4

144 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Command A

20 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Command A

$5.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,344

EloHigh is better

1,488+11%

LiveBench

High is better

56.2%

LiveBenchHigh is better

64.1%+14%

SWE-bench

High is better

42.6%

SWE-benchHigh is better

58.6%+38%

GPQA

High is better

66%

GPQAHigh is better

79%+20%

TTFT

Low is better

+31%175 ms

TTFTLow is better

230 ms

Speed

High is better

+20%118 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

98 tok/s

In $

Low is better

+20%$2.5/1M

In $Low is better

$3/1M

Out $

Low is better

+50%$10/1M

Out $Low is better

$15/1M

Context

High is better

256k

ContextHigh is better

256k

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 28% with Command A

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Command A$237.50 / mo

In: $87.50Out: $150.00

Grok 4$330.00 / mo

In: $105.00Out: $225.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Command A is estimated to save $92.50/month ($1,110/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Grok 4:Pick Grok 4 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Command A:Pick Command A when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Command A:Pick Command A when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4

Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).

High-volume chatCommand A

Lower output list price ($10/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4

Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 4	Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).
High-volume chat	Command A	Lower output list price ($10/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Command A	Lower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAG	Command A	Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 4	Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/command-a-vs-grok-4/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344

LiveBench56.2%

SWE-bench42.6%

Speed118 tok/s

Output cost$10/1M

xAI

Grok 4

Elo 1,488

LiveBench64.1%

SWE-bench58.6%

Speed98 tok/s

Output cost$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Grok 4?: Grok 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,488). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Command A or Grok 4?: Grok 4 leads SWE-bench at 58.6% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Command A output tokens are $10/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or Grok 4?: Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 230 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Grok 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All Grok 4 matchups →

Grok 4 vs Grok 3 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 (next grok)Grok 3 vs Command A Mistral Large 3 vs Grok 4 Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 4 Yi-Lightning vs Grok 4

Command A vs Grok 4 benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Command A (4)vsGrok 4 (4)

Command A: 4W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGrok 4: 4W (50%)

← Command A1 tiesGrok 4 →

Grok 4 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,344vs1,488

Coding Elo

—vs—

SWE-bench

42.6%vs58.6%

LiveBench

56.2%vs64.1%

GPQA Diamond

66%vs79%

Command A: 0WGrok 4: 4W

Command A (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs98 tok/s

Time to first token

175 msvs230 ms

Command A: 2WGrok 4: 0W

Command A (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$15/1M

Input price

$2.5/1Mvs$3/1M

Context window

256kvs256k

Command A: 2WGrok 4: 0W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4

Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).

High-volume chatCommand A

Lower output list price ($10/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4

Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 4	Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).
High-volume chat	Command A	Lower output list price ($10/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Command A	Lower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAG	Command A	Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 4	Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Grok 4?

Grok 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,488). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Command A or Grok 4?

Grok 4 leads SWE-bench at 58.6% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Command A output tokens are $10/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Command A or Grok 4?

Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 230 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 256k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Grok 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Grok 4

Command A

Command A

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Command A

Grok 4

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Grok 4

Command A

Command A

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Command A

Grok 4

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons