CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash benchmark

This page compares Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) (Cohere) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) wins on output price at $0.15/1M. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Cohere

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (cohere/command-r7b-12-2024). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.15/1M out

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Previous Google speed workhorse.

Elo 1,295$2.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) (2)vsGemini 2.5 Flash (7)
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024): 2W (22%)Overall: Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash: 7W (78%)
← Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)Gemini 2.5 Flash →
Gemini 2.5 Flash (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,295
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs48%
LiveBench
—vs51.4%
GPQA Diamond
—vs68.2%
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024): 0WGemini 2.5 Flash: 4W
Gemini 2.5 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs185 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs110 ms
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024): 0WGemini 2.5 Flash: 2W
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.15/1Mvs$2.5/1M
Input price
$0.04/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Context window
128kvs1M
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024): 2WGemini 2.5 Flash: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 2.5 Flash 5/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)

$2.35/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,295
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
51.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
48%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
68.2%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
110 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
185 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+700%$0.04/1M
In $Low is better
$0.3/1M
Out $
Low is better
+1567%$0.15/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.5/1M
Context
High is better
128k
ContextHigh is better
1M+719%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 93% with Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)$3.56 / mo
In: $1.31Out: $2.25
Gemini 2.5 Flash$48.00 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $37.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) is estimated to save $44.44/month ($533/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024):Pick Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Gemini 2.5 Flash:Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatCohere: Command R7B (12-2024)

Lower output list price ($0.15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatCohere: Command R7B (12-2024)Lower output list price ($0.15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 25, 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash: previous Google speed workhorse, still a baseline

Useful as a cheap historical compare. 3.7 Flash is the 2026 volume SKU.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/command-r7b-12-2024-vs-gemini-2-5-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Cohere

Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024)

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$0.15/1M
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Elo 1,295
LiveBench51.4%
SWE-bench48%
Speed185 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) output tokens are $0.15/1M versus $2.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 2.5 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 25, 2025

    Gemini 2.5 Flash: previous Google speed workhorse, still a baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) matchups →|All Gemini 2.5 Flash matchups →
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (next gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 3.6 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash