CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Yi-Large

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Yi-Large benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Yi-Large is more budget-friendly at $0.3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Large if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
DeepSeek
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3-0324). Preview until a second source matches.

$1.12/1M out
01.AI
Yi-Large

01.AI full-scale dense model for complex instruction following.

Elo 1,430$0.3/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

Yi-Large

$0.3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageYi-Large 5/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (2)vsYi-Large (8)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324: 2W (20%)Overall: Yi-LargeYi-Large: 8W (80%)
← DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324Yi-Large →
Yi-Large (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,430
Coding Elo
—vs1,410
SWE-bench
—vs53.8%
LiveBench
—vs60.5%
GPQA Diamond
—vs72.4%
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324: 0WYi-Large: 5W
Yi-Large (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs90 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs220 ms
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324: 0WYi-Large: 2W
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$1.12/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Input price
$0.27/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Context window
164kvs33k
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324: 2WYi-Large: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large1,430
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding Elo
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large1,410
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large60.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large53.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large220 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324—
Yi-Large90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input priceDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (+$0.03/1M)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324$0.27/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output priceYi-Large (+$0.82/1M)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324$1.12/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context windowDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (+131k)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Yi-Large33k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324Yi-LargeAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,430
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,410
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
60.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
53.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
220 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.27/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (+$0.03/1M)
Output price
$1.12/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Yi-Large (+$0.82/1M)
Context window
164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 (+131k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 43% with Yi-Large
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324$26.25 / mo
In: $9.45Out: $16.8
Yi-Large$15.00 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $4.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Large is estimated to save $11.25/month ($135/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Yi-Large:Pick Yi-Large when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatYi-Large

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324

Larger window (164k).

Screenshots / visionYi-Large

Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatYi-LargeLower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324Larger window (164k).
Screenshots / visionYi-LargeYi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-chat-v3-0324-vs-yi-large/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$1.12/1M
01.AI

Yi-Large

Elo 1,430
LiveBench60.5%
SWE-bench53.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Yi-Large?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Yi-Large?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Large output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $1.12/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 or Yi-Large?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 accepts 164k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 and Yi-Large Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3 0324 matchups →|All Yi-Large matchups →
Yi-Large vs Yi-Lightning (next other)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Yi-LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Yi-LargeClaude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-LargeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Yi-LargeClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Yi-Large