CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs FLUX.1 [dev]

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs FLUX.1 [dev] benchmark

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between DeepSeek Coder V2 and FLUX.1 [dev]. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both DeepSeek Coder V2 and FLUX.1 [dev] present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
DeepSeek
DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Img Elo 1,365
Black Forest Labs
FLUX.1 [dev]

Open-weights non-commercial base model with 12B parameters, serving as the foundation for the open-source fine-tuning ecosystem.

Open Dev 12BImg Elo 1,180$30/1k imgs
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek Coder V2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)
Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (0)vsFLUX.1 [dev] (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0W (0%)Overall: FLUX.1 [dev]FLUX.1 [dev]: 5W (100%)
← DeepSeek Coder V2FLUX.1 [dev] →
FLUX.1 [dev] (3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Image Elo
—vs1,180
Prompt adherence
—vs87.5%
Text rendering
—vs86%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WFLUX.1 [dev]: 3W
FLUX.1 [dev] (1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Generation time
—vs4s
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WFLUX.1 [dev]: 1W
FLUX.1 [dev] (1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Price per 1k images
—vs$30/1k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WFLUX.1 [dev]: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo
DeepSeek Coder V2—
FLUX.1 [dev]1,180
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time
DeepSeek Coder V2—
FLUX.1 [dev]4s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images
DeepSeek Coder V2—
FLUX.1 [dev]$30/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence
DeepSeek Coder V2—
FLUX.1 [dev]87.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering
DeepSeek Coder V2—
FLUX.1 [dev]86%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder V2FLUX.1 [dev]Advantage Delta
Image Elo—
1,180
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Generation time—
4s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Price per 1k images—
$30/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Prompt adherence—
87.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Text rendering—
86%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)
Quick Presets:
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.00 / mo
Rate: $0/1k
FLUX.1 [dev]$750.00 / mo
Rate: $30/1k
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $750.00/month ($9,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [dev]

FLUX.1 [dev] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatinsufficient dataNeed list prices.
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGinsufficient dataNeed context sizes.
Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [dev]FLUX.1 [dev] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-flux-1-dev/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
LiveBench58.6%
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed75 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost—

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or FLUX.1 [dev]?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or FLUX.1 [dev]?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or FLUX.1 [dev]?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?
Both DeepSeek Coder V2 and FLUX.1 [dev] are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and FLUX.1 [dev] Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All FLUX.1 [dev] matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)FLUX.1 [dev] vs FLUX.1 [schnell] (next flux)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek Coder V2FLUX.2 [max] vs FLUX.1 [dev]