CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek Coder V2 (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Terra is ahead by 183 points (1,548 vs 1,365; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Terra resolves 70.4% versus 60.5% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Terra streams faster (128 tok/s) while DeepSeek Coder V2 is the cheaper output token ($0.28/1M). GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Terra leads preference Elo (1,548 vs 1,365). GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek Coder V2 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365$0.28/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Elo 1,548$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (2)vsGPT-5.6 Terra (8)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2W (20%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra: 8W (80%)
← DeepSeek Coder V2GPT-5.6 Terra →
GPT-5.6 Terra (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,365vs1,548
Coding Elo
1,442vs1,542
SWE-bench
60.5%vs70.4%
LiveBench
58.6%vs69.1%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs82%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 5W
GPT-5.6 Terra (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
75 tok/svs128 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs160 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 2W
DeepSeek Coder V2 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$6/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$1/1M
Context window
128kvs1.1M
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WGPT-5.6 Terra: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Terra 5/6
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Terra

183 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Terra

53 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek Coder V2

$5.72/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,365
EloHigh is better
1,548+13%
Code Elo
High is better
1,442
Code EloHigh is better
1,542+7%
LiveBench
High is better
58.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.1%+18%
SWE-bench
High is better
60.5%
SWE-benchHigh is better
70.4%+16%
GPQA
High is better
70.2%
GPQAHigh is better
82%+17%
TTFT
Low is better
290 ms
TTFTLow is better
160 ms+81%
Speed
High is better
75 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
128 tok/s+71%
In $
Low is better
+614%$0.14/1M
In $Low is better
$1/1M
Out $
Low is better
+2043%$0.28/1M
Out $Low is better
$6/1M
Context
High is better
128k
ContextHigh is better
1.1M+720%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 93% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $4.20
GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $90.00
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $115.90/month ($1,391/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower TTFT (160 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 TerraHigher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 TerraLower TTFT (160 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 TerraLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-gpt-5-6-terra/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
LiveBench58.6%
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed75 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548
LiveBench69.1%
SWE-bench70.4%
Speed128 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 60.5%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower time-to-first-token (160 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek Coder V2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and GPT-5.6 Terra Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraDeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 Terra