CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Mistral Large 3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Mistral Large 3 benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek Coder V2 (DeepSeek) and Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Mistral Large 3 is ahead by 91 points (1,456 vs 1,365; lmarena (Aug 17, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 resolves 60.5% versus 55.4% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). Mistral Large 3 streams faster (112 tok/s) while DeepSeek Coder V2 is the cheaper output token ($0.28/1M). DeepSeek Coder V2 has the larger context window (128k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Mistral Large 3 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Mistral Large 3 leads preference Elo (1,456 vs 1,365). DeepSeek Coder V2 leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek Coder V2 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365$0.28/1M out

Mistral

Mistral Large 3

Mistral European flagship with strong function calling.

Elo 1,456$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (4)vsMistral Large 3 (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 4W (44%)Overall: Mistral Large 3Mistral Large 3: 5W (56%)
← DeepSeek Coder V21 tiesMistral Large 3 →
Mistral Large 3 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,365vs1,456
Coding Elo
1,442vs—
SWE-bench
60.5%vs55.4%
LiveBench
58.6%vs61.8%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs74.1%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WMistral Large 3: 3W
Mistral Large 3 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
75 tok/svs112 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs190 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WMistral Large 3: 2W
DeepSeek Coder V2 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$6/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
128kvs128k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WMistral Large 3: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageMistral Large 3 3/6
Preference Elo

Mistral Large 3

91 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Mistral Large 3

37 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

DeepSeek Coder V2

$5.72/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,365
EloHigh is better
1,456+7%
Code Elo
High is better
1,442
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
58.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
61.8%+5%
SWE-bench
High is better
+9%60.5%
SWE-benchHigh is better
55.4%
GPQA
High is better
70.2%
GPQAHigh is better
74.1%+6%
TTFT
Low is better
290 ms
TTFTLow is better
190 ms+53%
Speed
High is better
75 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
112 tok/s+49%
In $
Low is better
+1329%$0.14/1M
In $Low is better
$2/1M
Out $
Low is better
+2043%$0.28/1M
Out $Low is better
$6/1M
Context
High is better
128k
ContextHigh is better
128k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 94% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $4.20
Mistral Large 3$160.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $90.00
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $150.90/month ($1,811/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Mistral Large 3:Pick Mistral Large 3 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Mistral Large 3:Pick Mistral Large 3 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2

Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMistral Large 3

Lower TTFT (190 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2

Larger window (128k).

Screenshots / visionMistral Large 3

Mistral Large 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMistral Large 3Lower TTFT (190 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2Larger window (128k).
Screenshots / visionMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJan 18, 2026

Mistral Large 3: the European flagship with function calling

Jan 2026. Not the Elo crown. Useful when residency and tools matter more than Arena.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-mistral-large-3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
LiveBench58.6%
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed75 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M
Mistral

Mistral Large 3

Elo 1,456
LiveBench61.8%
SWE-bench55.4%
Speed112 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,456). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Mistral Large 3?
DeepSeek Coder V2 leads SWE-bench at 60.5% vs 55.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 has the lower time-to-first-token (190 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek Coder V2 accepts 128k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek Coder V2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and Mistral Large 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jan 18, 2026

    Mistral Large 3: the European flagship with function calling

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All Mistral Large 3 matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)Mistral Large 3 vs Codestral 25.01 (previous mistral)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mistral Large 3DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek Coder V2Codestral 25.01 vs DeepSeek Coder V2