CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins on output price at $0.95/1M. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (deepseek/deepseek-v3.1-terminus). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.95/1M out

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

3.6 FlashElo 1,506$3.75/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (2)vsGemini 3.6 Flash (8)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 2W (20%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash: 8W (80%)
← DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.6 Flash →
Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,506
Coding Elo
—vs1,514
SWE-bench
—vs70.8%
LiveBench
—vs67.2%
GPQA Diamond
—vs79.6%
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 0WGemini 3.6 Flash: 5W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs198 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs92 ms
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 0WGemini 3.6 Flash: 2W
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.95/1Mvs$3.75/1M
Input price
$0.27/1Mvs$0.75/1M
Context window
164kvs1M
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 2WGemini 3.6 Flash: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.6 Flash 5/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Token Price Efficiency

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

$2.80/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,506
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,514
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
70.8%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
79.6%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
92 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
198 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+178%$0.27 / 1M
In $Low is better
$0.75 / 1M
Out $
Low is better
+295%$0.95 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$3.75 / 1M
Context
High is better
164k
ContextHigh is better
1M+540%
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 71% with DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$23.70 / mo
In: $9.45Out: $14.25
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is estimated to save $58.80/month ($706/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus:Pick DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Lower output list price ($0.95/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLower output list price ($0.95/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-vs-gemini-3-6-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$0.95/1M
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed198 tok/s
Output cost$3.75/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus output tokens are $0.95/1M versus $3.75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.6 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus matchups →|All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash