CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,425 vs 1,310), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is more budget-friendly at $0.72/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B holds the advantage over DeepSeek V3 in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek V3 (0)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (9)
DeepSeek V3
0 of 9 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
9 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310$1.1/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 9 of 9 metrics
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

Elo 1,425$0.72/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek V3
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Δ 115 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

110 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

$0.72 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek V3 (0)vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B (10)
DeepSeek V3: 0W (0%)Overall: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 10W (100%)
← DeepSeek V3Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B →
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Preference Elo
1,310vs1,425+115
Coding Elo
—vs1,495
SWE-bench
48.6%vs65.2%+16.6%
LiveBench
55.4%vs64.8%+9.4%
GPQA Diamond
59.1%vs74%+14.9%
DeepSeek V3: 0WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 5W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Output speed
66 tok/svs110 tok/s+44 tok/s
Time to first token
380 msvs180 ms+200 ms
DeepSeek V3: 0WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Output price
$1.1/1Mvs$0.72/1M+$0.38/1M
Input price
$0.27/1Mvs$0.18/1M+$0.09/1M
Context window
128kvs131k+3k
DeepSeek V3: 0WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+115
DeepSeek V31,310
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,425
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
DeepSeek V3—
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,495
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+9.4%
DeepSeek V355.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+16.6%
DeepSeek V348.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+14.9%
DeepSeek V359.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+200 ms
DeepSeek V3380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+44 tok/s
DeepSeek V366 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.09/1M
DeepSeek V3$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.18/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$0.38/1M
DeepSeek V3$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.72/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+3k
DeepSeek V3128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,310
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,425
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+115
Coding Elo—
1,495
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
LiveBench
55.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+9.4%
SWE-bench
48.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+16.6%
GPQA Diamond
59.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+14.9%
Time to first token
380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+200 ms
Output speed
66 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+44 tok/s
Input price
$0.27/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.18/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.09/1M
Output price
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.72/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.38/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+3k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 34% with Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V3$25.95 / mo
In: $9.45Out: $16.5
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$17.10 / mo
In: $6.3Out: $10.8
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is estimated to save $8.85/month ($106/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Lower output list price ($0.72/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Lower TTFT (180 ms).

Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen 2.5 Coder 32BHigher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLower output list price ($0.72/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLower TTFT (180 ms).
Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLarger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v3-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed (tok/s)66 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.27/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Elo 1,425
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.72/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,425). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 48.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B output tokens are $0.72/1M versus $1.1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B has the lower time-to-first-token (180 ms vs 380 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B accepts 131k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Both DeepSeek V3 and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V3 and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V3 matchups →|All Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B matchups →
DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen3 235B (next qwen)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B