CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Doubao Pro 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Doubao Pro 1.5 benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and Doubao Pro 1.5 (ByteDance) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, DeepSeek V4 Pro is ahead by 66 points (1,536 vs 1,470; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro resolves 71.6% versus 62.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Doubao Pro 1.5 streams faster (105 tok/s) while Doubao Pro 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.28/1M). DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Doubao Pro 1.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. DeepSeek V4 Pro leads preference Elo (1,536 vs 1,470). DeepSeek V4 Pro leads SWE-bench coding. Doubao Pro 1.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

Elo 1,536$0.87/1M out

ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

Elo 1,470$0.28/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (6)vsDoubao Pro 1.5 (4)
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 6W (60%)Overall: DeepSeek V4 ProDoubao Pro 1.5: 4W (40%)
← DeepSeek V4 ProDoubao Pro 1.5 →
DeepSeek V4 Pro (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,536vs1,470
Coding Elo
1,544vs1,465
SWE-bench
71.6%vs62.1%
LiveBench
70.1%vs64%
GPQA Diamond
84%vs77.5%
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 5WDoubao Pro 1.5: 0W
Doubao Pro 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
70 tok/svs105 tok/s
Time to first token
410 msvs190 ms
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 0WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W
Doubao Pro 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.87/1Mvs$0.28/1M
Input price
$0.44/1Mvs$0.11/1M
Context window
1Mvs128k
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 1WDoubao Pro 1.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageDeepSeek V4 Pro 4/6
Preference Elo

DeepSeek V4 Pro

66 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Doubao Pro 1.5

35 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Doubao Pro 1.5

$0.59/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+4%1,536
EloHigh is better
1,470
Code Elo
High is better
+5%1,544
Code EloHigh is better
1,465
LiveBench
High is better
+10%70.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64%
SWE-bench
High is better
+15%71.6%
SWE-benchHigh is better
62.1%
GPQA
High is better
+8%84%
GPQAHigh is better
77.5%
TTFT
Low is better
410 ms
TTFTLow is better
190 ms+116%
Speed
High is better
70 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
105 tok/s+50%
In $
Low is better
$0.44/1M
In $Low is better
$0.11/1M+295%
Out $
Low is better
$0.87/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.28/1M+211%
Context
High is better
+719%1M
ContextHigh is better
128k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 72% with Doubao Pro 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V4 Pro$28.28 / mo
In: $15.22Out: $13.05
Doubao Pro 1.5$8.05 / mo
In: $3.85Out: $4.20
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Pro 1.5 is estimated to save $20.22/month ($243/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek V4 Pro:Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek V4 Pro

Higher SWE-bench (71.6%).

High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower TTFT (190 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionDoubao Pro 1.5

Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek V4 ProHigher SWE-bench (71.6%).
High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5Lower TTFT (190 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 ProLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionDoubao Pro 1.5Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareJun 13, 2026

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

Top DeepSeek vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually V4 Pro vs Opus 5. License and invoice decide as much as Elo.

launchJun 12, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

2026-06 open-weight-adjacent flagship. The usual cheap-vs-Claude question starts here.

launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-doubao-1-5-pro-128k/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Elo 1,536
LiveBench70.1%
SWE-bench71.6%
Speed70 tok/s
Output cost$0.87/1M
ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

Elo 1,470
LiveBench64%
SWE-bench62.1%
Speed105 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Doubao Pro 1.5?
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,536). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Doubao Pro 1.5?
DeepSeek V4 Pro leads SWE-bench at 71.6% vs 62.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Pro 1.5 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $0.87/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Doubao Pro 1.5?
Doubao Pro 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (190 ms vs 410 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Doubao Pro 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Jun 13, 2026

    DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

  • launch · Jun 12, 2026

    DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

  • launch · Jan 20, 2025

    DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V4 Pro matchups →|All Doubao Pro 1.5 matchups →
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (next deepseek)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5 (previous seed)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo (next seed)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Doubao Pro 1.5GPT-4.5 Orion vs DeepSeek V4 Pro