Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs FLUX.1 [schnell] benchmark

Name: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs FLUX.1 [schnell] AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and FLUX.1 [schnell] (Black Forest Labs) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

Elo 1,536$3.9600000000000004/1M out

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Apache 2.0 4-step distilled open weights model optimized for local inference and instant preview generation.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (10)vsFLUX.1 [schnell] (0)

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 10W (100%)Overall: DeepSeek V4 ProFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W (0%)

← DeepSeek V4 ProFLUX.1 [schnell] →

DeepSeek V4 Pro (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,536vs—

Coding Elo

1,544vs—

SWE-bench

71.6%vs—

LiveBench

70.1%vs—

GPQA Diamond

84%vs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 5WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

70 tok/svs—

Time to first token

410 msvs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 2WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$3.96/1Mvs—

Input price

$1.32/1Mvs—

Context window

1Mvs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 3WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageFLUX.1 [schnell] 5/6

Preference Elo

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

Price Efficiency

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,536

EloHigh is better

—

Code Elo

High is better

1,544

Code EloHigh is better

—

LiveBench

High is better

70.1%

LiveBenchHigh is better

—

SWE-bench

High is better

71.6%

SWE-benchHigh is better

—

GPQA

High is better

84%

GPQAHigh is better

—

TTFT

Low is better

410 ms

TTFTLow is better

—

Speed

High is better

70 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

—

In $

Low is better

$1.32/1M

In $Low is better

—

Out $

Low is better

$3.96/1M

Out $Low is better

—

Context

High is better

ContextHigh is better

—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	FLUX.1 [schnell]	FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareJun 13, 2026

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

Top DeepSeek vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually V4 Pro vs Opus 5. License and invoice decide as much as Elo.

launchJun 12, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

2026-06 open-weight-adjacent flagship. The usual cheap-vs-Claude question starts here.

launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-flux-1-schnell/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Elo 1,536

LiveBench70.1%

SWE-bench71.6%

Speed70 tok/s

Output cost$3.96/1M

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Elo n/a

LiveBench—

SWE-bench—

Speed—

Output cost—

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Both DeepSeek V4 Pro and FLUX.1 [schnell] are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Pro and FLUX.1 [schnell] Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V4 Pro matchups →|All FLUX.1 [schnell] matchups →

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (next deepseek)FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1 [dev] (previous flux)FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1.1 [pro] (next flux)FLUX.2 [max] vs FLUX.1 [schnell]FLUX.2 [flex] vs FLUX.1 [schnell]

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (10)vsFLUX.1 [schnell] (0)

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 10W (100%)Overall: DeepSeek V4 ProFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W (0%)

← DeepSeek V4 ProFLUX.1 [schnell] →

DeepSeek V4 Pro (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,536vs—

Coding Elo

1,544vs—

SWE-bench

71.6%vs—

LiveBench

70.1%vs—

GPQA Diamond

84%vs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 5WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

70 tok/svs—

Time to first token

410 msvs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 2WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

DeepSeek V4 Pro (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$3.96/1Mvs—

Input price

$1.32/1Mvs—

Context window

1Mvs—

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 3WFLUX.1 [schnell]: 0W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	FLUX.1 [schnell]	FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or FLUX.1 [schnell]?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Both DeepSeek V4 Pro and FLUX.1 [schnell] are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Pro and FLUX.1 [schnell] Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

DeepSeek V4 Pro

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

DeepSeek V4 Pro

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons