CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 (kwaipilot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 wins on output price at $1.2/1M. DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

Elo 1,536$3.9600000000000004/1M out

kwaipilot

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (kwaipilot/kat-coder-pro-v2). Preview until a second source matches.

$1.2/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (8)vsKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 (2)
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 8W (80%)Overall: DeepSeek V4 ProKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2: 2W (20%)
← DeepSeek V4 ProKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 →
DeepSeek V4 Pro (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,536vs—
Coding Elo
1,544vs—
SWE-bench
71.6%vs—
LiveBench
70.1%vs—
GPQA Diamond
84%vs—
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 5WKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2: 0W
DeepSeek V4 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
70 tok/svs—
Time to first token
410 msvs—
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 2WKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2: 0W
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3.96/1Mvs$1.2/1M
Input price
$1.32/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Context window
1Mvs262k
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 1WKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageDeepSeek V4 Pro 5/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

$2.76/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,536
EloHigh is better
—
Code Elo
High is better
1,544
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
70.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
—
SWE-bench
High is better
71.6%
SWE-benchHigh is better
—
GPQA
High is better
84%
GPQAHigh is better
—
TTFT
Low is better
410 ms
TTFTLow is better
—
Speed
High is better
70 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
—
In $
Low is better
$1.32/1M
In $Low is better
$0.3/1M+340%
Out $
Low is better
$3.96/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.2/1M+230%
Context
High is better
+300%1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 73% with Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V4 Pro$105.60 / mo
In: $46.20Out: $59.40
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2$28.50 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $18.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 is estimated to save $77.10/month ($925/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2:Pick Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V4 Pro:Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 ProLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareJun 13, 2026

DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

Top DeepSeek vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually V4 Pro vs Opus 5. License and invoice decide as much as Elo.

launchJun 12, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

2026-06 open-weight-adjacent flagship. The usual cheap-vs-Claude question starts here.

launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-kat-coder-pro-v2/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Elo 1,536
LiveBench70.1%
SWE-bench71.6%
Speed70 tok/s
Output cost$3.96/1M
kwaipilot

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $3.96/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Jun 13, 2026

    DeepSeek vs Claude: the cheap-versus-frontier question, remapped

  • launch · Jun 12, 2026

    DeepSeek V4 Pro: high reasoning density per dollar

  • launch · Jan 20, 2025

    DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V4 Pro matchups →|All Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2 matchups →
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (next deepseek)GPT-4.5 Orion vs DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 ProKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 ProClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro