Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs GLM-5.2 benchmark

Name: Doubao Lite 1.5 vs GLM-5.2 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Doubao Lite 1.5 (ByteDance) and GLM-5.2 (Zhipu) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GLM-5.2 is ahead by 132 points (1,492 vs 1,360; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GLM-5.2 resolves 69.3% versus 46% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Doubao Lite 1.5 streams faster (180 tok/s) while Doubao Lite 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.1/1M). GLM-5.2 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

Elo 1,360$0.1/1M out

Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

Elo 1,492$0.9680000000000001/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Lite 1.5 (4)vsGLM-5.2 (6)

Doubao Lite 1.5: 4W (40%)Overall: GLM-5.2GLM-5.2: 6W (60%)

← Doubao Lite 1.5GLM-5.2 →

GLM-5.2 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,360vs1,492

Coding Elo

1,320vs1,504

SWE-bench

46%vs69.3%

LiveBench

54%vs65.2%

GPQA Diamond

64.2%vs79.5%

Doubao Lite 1.5: 0WGLM-5.2: 5W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

180 tok/svs84 tok/s

Time to first token

110 msvs270 ms

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGLM-5.2: 0W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.1/1Mvs$0.97/1M

Input price

$0.04/1Mvs$0.31/1M

Context window

33kvs1M

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGLM-5.2: 1W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGLM-5.2 4/6

Preference Elo

GLM-5.2

132 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Doubao Lite 1.5

96 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Doubao Lite 1.5

$0.87/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,360

EloHigh is better

1,492+10%

Code Elo

High is better

1,320

Code EloHigh is better

1,504+14%

LiveBench

High is better

54%

LiveBenchHigh is better

65.2%+21%

SWE-bench

High is better

46%

SWE-benchHigh is better

69.3%+51%

GPQA

High is better

64.2%

GPQAHigh is better

79.5%+24%

TTFT

Low is better

+145%110 ms

TTFTLow is better

270 ms

Speed

High is better

+114%180 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

84 tok/s

In $

Low is better

+670%$0.04/1M

In $Low is better

$0.31/1M

Out $

Low is better

+868%$0.1/1M

Out $Low is better

$0.97/1M

Context

High is better

33k

ContextHigh is better

1M+3100%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 89% with Doubao Lite 1.5

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Doubao Lite 1.5$2.90 / mo

In: $1.40Out: $1.50

GLM-5.2$25.30 / mo

In: $10.78Out: $14.52

Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $22.40/month ($269/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
GLM-5.2:Pick GLM-5.2 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGLM-5.2

Higher SWE-bench (69.3%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGGLM-5.2

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	GLM-5.2	Higher SWE-bench (69.3%).
High-volume chat	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAG	GLM-5.2	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	GLM-5.2	GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

newsAug 16, 2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-lite-vs-glm-5-2/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

Elo 1,360

LiveBench54%

SWE-bench46%

Speed180 tok/s

Output cost$0.1/1M

Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Elo 1,492

LiveBench65.2%

SWE-bench69.3%

Speed84 tok/s

Output cost$0.97/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?: GLM-5.2 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,492). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?: GLM-5.2 leads SWE-bench at 69.3% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $0.97/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?: Doubao Lite 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: GLM-5.2 accepts 1M tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?: GLM-5.2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and GLM-5.2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Doubao Lite 1.5 matchups →|All GLM-5.2 matchups →

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (next seed)GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3 (next glm)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs GLM-5.2 Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM-5.2 Mistral Large 3 vs GLM-5.2 Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-5.2

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs GLM-5.2 benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Lite 1.5 (4)vsGLM-5.2 (6)

Doubao Lite 1.5: 4W (40%)Overall: GLM-5.2GLM-5.2: 6W (60%)

← Doubao Lite 1.5GLM-5.2 →

GLM-5.2 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,360vs1,492

Coding Elo

1,320vs1,504

SWE-bench

46%vs69.3%

LiveBench

54%vs65.2%

GPQA Diamond

64.2%vs79.5%

Doubao Lite 1.5: 0WGLM-5.2: 5W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

180 tok/svs84 tok/s

Time to first token

110 msvs270 ms

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGLM-5.2: 0W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.1/1Mvs$0.97/1M

Input price

$0.04/1Mvs$0.31/1M

Context window

33kvs1M

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGLM-5.2: 1W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGLM-5.2

Higher SWE-bench (69.3%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGGLM-5.2

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	GLM-5.2	Higher SWE-bench (69.3%).
High-volume chat	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAG	GLM-5.2	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	GLM-5.2	GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,492). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 leads SWE-bench at 69.3% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $0.97/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or GLM-5.2?

Doubao Lite 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

GLM-5.2 accepts 1M tokens versus 33k.

Can I self-host either model?

GLM-5.2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and GLM-5.2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GLM-5.2

Doubao Lite 1.5

Doubao Lite 1.5

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Doubao Lite 1.5

GLM-5.2

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GLM-5.2

Doubao Lite 1.5

Doubao Lite 1.5

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Doubao Lite 1.5

GLM-5.2

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons