Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Grok 3 benchmark

Name: Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Grok 3 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Doubao Lite 1.5 (ByteDance) and Grok 3 (xAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 3 is ahead by 45 points (1,405 vs 1,360; lmarena (Aug 17, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Grok 3 resolves 51.4% versus 46% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). Doubao Lite 1.5 streams faster (180 tok/s) while Doubao Lite 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.1/1M). Grok 3 has the larger context window (131k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

Elo 1,360$0.1/1M out

xAI

Grok 3

Previous xAI generation before Grok 4. Kept for grok 3 vs grok 4.

Elo 1,405$15/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Lite 1.5 (5)vsGrok 3 (5)

Doubao Lite 1.5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGrok 3: 5W (50%)

← Doubao Lite 1.5Grok 3 →

Grok 3 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,360vs1,405

Coding Elo

1,320vs—

SWE-bench

46%vs51.4%

LiveBench

54%vs60.2%

GPQA Diamond

64.2%vs74.2%

Doubao Lite 1.5: 1WGrok 3: 4W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

180 tok/svs88 tok/s

Time to first token

110 msvs250 ms

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGrok 3: 0W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.1/1Mvs$15/1M

Input price

$0.04/1Mvs$3/1M

Context window

33kvs131k

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGrok 3: 1W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGrok 3 4/6

Preference Elo

Grok 3

45 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Doubao Lite 1.5

92 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Doubao Lite 1.5

$14.90/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,360

EloHigh is better

1,405+3%

Code Elo

High is better

1,320

Code EloHigh is better

—

LiveBench

High is better

54%

LiveBenchHigh is better

60.2%+11%

SWE-bench

High is better

46%

SWE-benchHigh is better

51.4%+12%

GPQA

High is better

64.2%

GPQAHigh is better

74.2%+16%

TTFT

Low is better

+127%110 ms

TTFTLow is better

250 ms

Speed

High is better

+105%180 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

88 tok/s

In $

Low is better

+7400%$0.04/1M

In $Low is better

$3/1M

Out $

Low is better

+14900%$0.1/1M

Out $Low is better

$15/1M

Context

High is better

33k

ContextHigh is better

131k+300%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 99% with Doubao Lite 1.5

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Doubao Lite 1.5$2.90 / mo

In: $1.40Out: $1.50

Grok 3$330.00 / mo

In: $105.00Out: $225.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $327.10/month ($3,925/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Grok 3:Pick Grok 3 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 3

Higher SWE-bench (51.4%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGGrok 3

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 3

Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 3	Higher SWE-bench (51.4%).
High-volume chat	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAG	Grok 3	Larger window (131k).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 3	Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-lite-vs-grok-3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

Elo 1,360

LiveBench54%

SWE-bench46%

Speed180 tok/s

Output cost$0.1/1M

xAI

Grok 3

Elo 1,405

LiveBench60.2%

SWE-bench51.4%

Speed88 tok/s

Output cost$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?: Grok 3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,405). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?: Grok 3 leads SWE-bench at 51.4% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?: Doubao Lite 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Grok 3 accepts 131k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and Grok 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Doubao Lite 1.5 matchups →|All Grok 3 matchups →

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (next seed)Grok 3 vs Grok 4 (next grok)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 3 Grok 4.6 vs Grok 3 Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Grok 3 Mistral Large 3 vs Grok 3

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Grok 3 benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Lite 1.5 (5)vsGrok 3 (5)

Doubao Lite 1.5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGrok 3: 5W (50%)

← Doubao Lite 1.5Grok 3 →

Grok 3 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,360vs1,405

Coding Elo

1,320vs—

SWE-bench

46%vs51.4%

LiveBench

54%vs60.2%

GPQA Diamond

64.2%vs74.2%

Doubao Lite 1.5: 1WGrok 3: 4W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

180 tok/svs88 tok/s

Time to first token

110 msvs250 ms

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGrok 3: 0W

Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.1/1Mvs$15/1M

Input price

$0.04/1Mvs$3/1M

Context window

33kvs131k

Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WGrok 3: 1W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 3

Higher SWE-bench (51.4%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGGrok 3

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 3

Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 3	Higher SWE-bench (51.4%).
High-volume chat	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAG	Grok 3	Larger window (131k).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 3	Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?

Grok 3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,405). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?

Grok 3 leads SWE-bench at 51.4% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Grok 3?

Doubao Lite 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 accepts 131k tokens versus 33k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and Grok 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.