CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Doubao Lite 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 benchmark

This page compares Doubao Lite 1.5 (ByteDance) and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is ahead by 155 points (1,515 vs 1,360; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 resolves 71.3% versus 46% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Doubao Lite 1.5 streams faster (180 tok/s) while Doubao Lite 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.1/1M). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads preference Elo (1,515 vs 1,360). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. Doubao Lite 1.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

Elo 1,360$0.1/1M out

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,515$2.8499999999999996/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Lite 1.5 (4)vsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (6)
Doubao Lite 1.5: 4W (40%)Overall: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 6W (60%)
← Doubao Lite 1.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,360vs1,515
Coding Elo
1,320vs1,520
SWE-bench
46%vs71.3%
LiveBench
54%vs67.2%
GPQA Diamond
64.2%vs87.6%
Doubao Lite 1.5: 0WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 5W
Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
180 tok/svs72 tok/s
Time to first token
110 msvs270 ms
Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 0W
Doubao Lite 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.1/1Mvs$2.85/1M
Input price
$0.04/1Mvs$0.57/1M
Context window
33kvs262k
Doubao Lite 1.5: 2WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 4/6
Preference Elo

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

155 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Doubao Lite 1.5

108 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Doubao Lite 1.5

$2.75/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,360
EloHigh is better
1,515+11%
Code Elo
High is better
1,320
Code EloHigh is better
1,520+15%
LiveBench
High is better
54%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.2%+24%
SWE-bench
High is better
46%
SWE-benchHigh is better
71.3%+55%
GPQA
High is better
64.2%
GPQAHigh is better
87.6%+36%
TTFT
Low is better
+145%110 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms
Speed
High is better
+150%180 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
72 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+1325%$0.04/1M
In $Low is better
$0.57/1M
Out $
Low is better
+2750%$0.1/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.85/1M
Context
High is better
33k
ContextHigh is better
262k+700%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 95% with Doubao Lite 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Doubao Lite 1.5$2.90 / mo
In: $1.40Out: $1.50
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$62.70 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $42.75
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $59.80/month ($718/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower TTFT (110 ms).

Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).
High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Lite 1.5Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-lite-vs-kimi-k2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

Elo 1,360
LiveBench54%
SWE-bench46%
Speed180 tok/s
Output cost$0.1/1M
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Elo 1,515
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench71.3%
Speed72 tok/s
Output cost$2.85/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,515). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench at 71.3% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $2.85/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
Doubao Lite 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (110 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 accepts 262k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Doubao Lite 1.5 matchups →|All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 matchups →
Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (next seed)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3 (next kimi)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Kimi Chat 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5Seed 2.1 Turbo vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5