CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 4.6

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 4.6 benchmark

This page compares Doubao Pro 1.5 (ByteDance) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 4.6 is ahead by 122 points (1,592 vs 1,470; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Grok 4.6 resolves 69.1% versus 62.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Grok 4.6 streams faster (118 tok/s) while Doubao Pro 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.28/1M). Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 4.6 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Grok 4.6 leads preference Elo (1,592 vs 1,470). Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench coding. Doubao Pro 1.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

Elo 1,470$0.28/1M out

xAI

Grok 4.6

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

Elo 1,592$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Doubao Pro 1.5 (3)vsGrok 4.6 (7)
Doubao Pro 1.5: 3W (30%)Overall: Grok 4.6Grok 4.6: 7W (70%)
← Doubao Pro 1.5Grok 4.6 →
Grok 4.6 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,470vs1,592
Coding Elo
1,465vs1,568
SWE-bench
62.1%vs69.1%
LiveBench
64%vs71.4%
GPQA Diamond
77.5%vs84.6%
Doubao Pro 1.5: 0WGrok 4.6: 5W
Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
105 tok/svs118 tok/s
Time to first token
190 msvs195 ms
Doubao Pro 1.5: 1WGrok 4.6: 1W
Doubao Pro 1.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$6/1M
Input price
$0.11/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
128kvs500k
Doubao Pro 1.5: 2WGrok 4.6: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGrok 4.6 5/6
Preference Elo

Grok 4.6

122 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Grok 4.6

13 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Doubao Pro 1.5

$5.72/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,470
EloHigh is better
1,592+8%
Code Elo
High is better
1,465
Code EloHigh is better
1,568+7%
LiveBench
High is better
64%
LiveBenchHigh is better
71.4%+12%
SWE-bench
High is better
62.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
69.1%+11%
GPQA
High is better
77.5%
GPQAHigh is better
84.6%+9%
TTFT
Low is better
+3%190 ms
TTFTLow is better
195 ms
Speed
High is better
105 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
118 tok/s+12%
In $
Low is better
+1718%$0.11/1M
In $Low is better
$2/1M
Out $
Low is better
+2043%$0.28/1M
Out $Low is better
$6/1M
Context
High is better
128k
ContextHigh is better
500k+291%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 95% with Doubao Pro 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Doubao Pro 1.5$8.05 / mo
In: $3.85Out: $4.20
Grok 4.6$160.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $90.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Pro 1.5 is estimated to save $151.95/month ($1,823/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Grok 4.6:Pick Grok 4.6 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Doubao Pro 1.5:Pick Doubao Pro 1.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6

Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).

High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5

Lower TTFT (190 ms).

Long-document RAGGrok 4.6

Larger window (500k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).
High-volume chatDoubao Pro 1.5Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDoubao Pro 1.5Lower TTFT (190 ms).
Long-document RAGGrok 4.6Larger window (500k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

launchAug 12, 2026

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

xAI’s Aug 12 2026 refresh of Grok 4.5. 500k context. The Grok vs ChatGPT hub remaps here.

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-pro-128k-vs-grok-4-6/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
ByteDance

Doubao Pro 1.5

Elo 1,470
LiveBench64%
SWE-bench62.1%
Speed105 tok/s
Output cost$0.28/1M
xAI

Grok 4.6

Elo 1,592
LiveBench71.4%
SWE-bench69.1%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Pro 1.5 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,592). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Doubao Pro 1.5 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 69.1% vs 62.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Doubao Pro 1.5 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Doubao Pro 1.5 or Grok 4.6?
Doubao Pro 1.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (190 ms vs 195 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Grok 4.6 accepts 500k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Pro 1.5 and Grok 4.6 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • launch · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Doubao Pro 1.5 matchups →|All Grok 4.6 matchups →
Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5 (previous seed)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo (next seed)Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Grok 3 vs Doubao Pro 1.5Yi-Lightning vs Doubao Pro 1.5