Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Ernie 4.5 Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,450 vs 1,285), while Ernie 4.5 Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (57%), while Llama 3.3 70B is more budget-friendly at $0.32/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
Baidu current multimodal enterprise foundation model with broad Chinese knowledge.
Δ 165 Arena Elo pts
140 tok/s
$0.32 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Llama 3.3 70B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | Ernie 4.5 Turbo (+165) | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | Ernie 4.5 Turbo (+11.2%) | ||
| SWE-bench | Ernie 4.5 Turbo (+11.9%) | ||
| GPQA Diamond | Ernie 4.5 Turbo (+8.8%) | ||
| Time to first token | Llama 3.3 70B (+40 ms) | ||
| Output speed | 95 tok/s | 140 tok/s | Llama 3.3 70B (+45 tok/s) |
| Input price | $0.3/1M | $0.1/1M | Llama 3.3 70B (+$0.2/1M) |
| Output price | $1.2/1M | $0.32/1M | Llama 3.3 70B (+$0.88/1M) |
| Context window | Llama 3.3 70B (+3k) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Llama 3.3 70B is estimated to save $20.20/month ($242/year).
Higher SWE-bench (57%).
Lower output list price ($0.32/1M).
Lower TTFT (160 ms).
Larger window (131k).
Ernie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Higher SWE-bench (57%). |
| High-volume chat | Llama 3.3 70B | Lower output list price ($0.32/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Llama 3.3 70B | Lower TTFT (160 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Llama 3.3 70B | Larger window (131k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Ernie 4.5 Turbo | Ernie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/ernie-4-5-vs-llama-3-3-70b/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card