CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. FLUX.2 [max] vs Qwen3 235B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

FLUX.2 [max] vs Qwen3 235B benchmark

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between FLUX.2 [max] and Qwen3 235B. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both FLUX.2 [max] and Qwen3 235B present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Black Forest Labs
FLUX.2 [max]

Black Forest Labs maximum-capacity flow-matching model with photoreal anatomy and leading typography fidelity.

Img Elo 1,233$70/1k imgs
Alibaba
Qwen3 235B

Open-weight Qwen3 mixture-of-experts.

235B MoEImg Elo 1,440

FLUX.2 Series Family & Variants (2)

Speed, cost, and intelligence tradeoffs across the Black Forest Labs lineup

FLUX.2 [max]
Black Forest Labs
Base Model
Img Elo1233
Latency5.1s
$/1k$70/1k
Prompt %91.2%
Selected
FLUX.2 [flex]
Black Forest Labs
Flex / Turbo
Img Elo1224
Latency2.8s
$/1k$60/1k
Prompt %90.5%
-9 Elo-14% price
View specs →vs this
Top Rival Showdowns for FLUX.2 [max]
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

FLUX.2 [max] (5)vsQwen3 235B (0)
FLUX.2 [max]: 5W (100%)Overall: FLUX.2 [max]Qwen3 235B: 0W (0%)
← FLUX.2 [max]Qwen3 235B →
FLUX.2 [max] (3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Image Elo
1,233vs—
Prompt adherence
91.2%vs—
Text rendering
92.8%vs—
FLUX.2 [max]: 3WQwen3 235B: 0W
FLUX.2 [max] (1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Generation time
5.1svs—
FLUX.2 [max]: 1WQwen3 235B: 0W
FLUX.2 [max] (1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Price per 1k images
$70/1kvs—
FLUX.2 [max]: 1WQwen3 235B: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo
FLUX.2 [max]1,233
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3 235B—
Generation time
FLUX.2 [max]5.1s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3 235B—
Price per 1k images
FLUX.2 [max]$70/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3 235B—
Prompt adherence
FLUX.2 [max]91.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3 235B—
Text rendering
FLUX.2 [max]92.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen3 235B—
BenchmarkFLUX.2 [max]Qwen3 235BAdvantage Delta
Image Elo
1,233
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Generation time
5.1s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Price per 1k images
$70/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Prompt adherence
91.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Text rendering
92.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Qwen3 235B
Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)
Quick Presets:
FLUX.2 [max]$1,750.00 / mo
Rate: $70/1k
Qwen3 235B$0.00 / mo
Rate: $0/1k
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen3 235B is estimated to save $1,750.00/month ($21,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.2 [max]

FLUX.2 [max] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatinsufficient dataNeed list prices.
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGinsufficient dataNeed context sizes.
Screenshots / visionFLUX.2 [max]FLUX.2 [max] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/flux-2-max-vs-qwen-3-235b/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2 [max]

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost—
Alibaba

Qwen3 235B

Elo 1,440
LiveBench63.5%
SWE-bench59.4%
Speed74 tok/s
Output cost$1.82/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.2 [max] or Qwen3 235B?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, FLUX.2 [max] or Qwen3 235B?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, FLUX.2 [max] or Qwen3 235B?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen3 235B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.2 [max] and Qwen3 235B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Sep 20, 2025

    Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All FLUX.2 [max] matchups →|All Qwen3 235B matchups →
FLUX.2 [max] vs FLUX.2 [flex] (previous flux)Qwen3 235B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (previous qwen)Qwen3 235B vs Qwen QwQ 32B (next qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen3 235BQwen Image 2.0 Pro vs FLUX.2 [max]Qwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen3 235B