CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 1.5 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 benchmark

This page compares Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google) and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is ahead by 205 points (1,465 vs 1,260; lmarena (Aug 17, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 resolves 65.8% versus 38% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 streams faster (85 tok/s) while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the cheaper output token ($2.3/1M). Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads preference Elo (1,465 vs 1,260). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads SWE-bench coding. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

First million-token Gemini Pro. Baseline for 1.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.x Pro.

Elo 1,260$5/1M out

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2). Preview until a second source matches.

K2 BaseElo 1,465$2.3/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 1.5 Pro (1)vsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (8)
Gemini 1.5 Pro: 1W (11%)Overall: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 8W (89%)
← Gemini 1.5 Pro1 tiesMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,260vs1,465
Coding Elo
—vs1,470
SWE-bench
38%vs65.8%
LiveBench
49.2%vs62.8%
GPQA Diamond
58%vs76.5%
Gemini 1.5 Pro: 0WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 5W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
70 tok/svs85 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs240 ms
Gemini 1.5 Pro: 0WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 1W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$5/1Mvs$2.3/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$0.57/1M
Context window
2Mvs131k
Gemini 1.5 Pro: 1WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 5/6
Preference Elo

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

205 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

15 tok/s faster

Token Price Efficiency

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

$2.70/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,260
EloHigh is better
1,465+16%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,470
LiveBench
High is better
49.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
62.8%+28%
SWE-bench
High is better
38%
SWE-benchHigh is better
65.8%+73%
GPQA
High is better
58%
GPQAHigh is better
76.5%+32%
TTFT
Low is better
240 ms
TTFTLow is better
240 ms
Speed
High is better
70 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
85 tok/s+21%
In $
Low is better
$1.25 / 1M
In $Low is better
$0.57 / 1M+119%
Out $
Low is better
$5.00 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$2.30 / 1M+117%
Context
High is better
+1426%2M
ContextHigh is better
131k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 54% with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 1.5 Pro$118.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $75
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$54.45 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $34.5
Estimated Cost Delta

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is estimated to save $64.30/month ($772/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 1.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 1.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).

High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 1.5 Pro

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 Pro

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).
High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 1.5 ProLower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 ProLarger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711).
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-kimi-k2/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Elo 1,260
LiveBench49.2%
SWE-bench38%
Speed70 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Elo 1,465
LiveBench62.8%
SWE-bench65.8%
Speed85 tok/s
Output cost$2.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,465). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 1.5 Pro or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads SWE-bench at 65.8% vs 38%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 output tokens are $2.3/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 1.5 Pro or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711?
Gemini 1.5 Pro has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 240 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 1.5 Pro and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 1.5 Pro matchups →|All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 matchups →
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (next gemini-pro)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (next kimi)Gemini 3 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Gemini 3 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Kimi K3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711