Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)
This page compares Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next wins on output price at $0.8/1M. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Alibaba
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder NextAuto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-coder-next). Preview until a second source matches.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
No shared data
No shared data
$1.70/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next is estimated to save $31.80/month ($382/year).
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Need TTFT on both sides.
Larger window (1M).
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next | Lower output list price ($0.8/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-qwen3-coder-next/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
