CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark

This page compares Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3.6 Flash is ahead by 156 points (1,506 vs 1,350; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash resolves 70.8% versus 63.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster (198 tok/s) while Gemini 3.6 Flash is the cheaper output token ($3.75/1M). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3.6 Flash leads preference Elo (1,506 vs 1,350). Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3.6 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Previous Google long-context flagship.

Elo 1,350$10/1M out

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

Elo 1,506$3.75/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (0)vsGemini 3.6 Flash (9)
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0W (0%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash: 9W (100%)
← Gemini 2.5 Pro1 tiesGemini 3.6 Flash →
Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,350vs1,506
Coding Elo
—vs1,514
SWE-bench
63.8%vs70.8%
LiveBench
57.1%vs67.2%
GPQA Diamond
76.4%vs79.6%
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0WGemini 3.6 Flash: 5W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
95 tok/svs198 tok/s
Time to first token
210 msvs92 ms
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0WGemini 3.6 Flash: 2W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$3.75/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$0.75/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0WGemini 3.6 Flash: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.6 Flash 5/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3.6 Flash

156 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.6 Flash

103 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3.6 Flash

$6.25/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,350
EloHigh is better
1,506+12%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,514
LiveBench
High is better
57.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.2%+18%
SWE-bench
High is better
63.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
70.8%+11%
GPQA
High is better
76.4%
GPQAHigh is better
79.6%+4%
TTFT
Low is better
210 ms
TTFTLow is better
92 ms+128%
Speed
High is better
95 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
198 tok/s+108%
In $
Low is better
$1.25/1M
In $Low is better
$0.75/1M+67%
Out $
Low is better
$10/1M
Out $Low is better
$3.75/1M+167%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 57% with Gemini 3.6 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 2.5 Pro$193.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $150.00
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3.6 Flash is estimated to save $111.25/month ($1,335/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 2.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower output list price ($3.75/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 FlashHigher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 3.6 FlashLower output list price ($3.75/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 FlashLower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 ProLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 FlashBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

launchMar 25, 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro remains the previous Google long-context flagship

2025-03 row. 3.x Pro replaced it. Kept for old “2.5 pro vs gpt-4o” inbound.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gemini-3-6-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Elo 1,350
LiveBench57.1%
SWE-bench63.8%
Speed95 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed198 tok/s
Output cost$3.75/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,506). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 63.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3.6 Flash output tokens are $3.75/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 210 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.6 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

  • launch · Mar 25, 2025

    Gemini 2.5 Pro remains the previous Google long-context flagship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 2.5 Pro matchups →|All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (previous gemini-pro)Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3 Pro (next gemini-pro)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash